Thanks for the well-detailed KIP, John. It's a +1 (binding) from me.
I want to point out one thing which I think is an oversight. The "Example Raw Query" scan includes a line using the `kafkaStreams.serdesForStore` method, but it's listed in the "Rejected Alternatives" section. Thanks, Bill On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:22 AM Bruno Cadonna <cado...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, John! > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Bruno > > On 19.11.21 18:04, Vasiliki Papavasileiou wrote: > > I think this KIP will greatly improve how we handle IQ in streams so +1 > > (non-binding) from me. > > > > Thank you John! > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:45 PM Patrick Stuedi > <pstu...@confluent.io.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding), thanks John! > >> -Patrick > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:27 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hello all, > >>> > >>> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-796, which proposes > >>> a revamp of the Interactive Query APIs in Kafka Streams. > >>> > >>> The proposal is here: > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/34xnCw > >>> > >>> Thanks to all who reviewed the proposal, and thanks in > >>> advance for taking the time to vote! > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> -John > >>> > >> > > >
