On Tue, May 3, 2022, at 23:16, Colin McCabe wrote: > > To be clear, the proposal here is to have the bridge release be 3.4 and > then move on to a ZK-free 4.0. With a 3.5 release as an option (but not > requirement) if we can't finish everything in time after 3.4. So that > would be two more releases with ZK, or dropping ZK a little bit less > than a year from now. >
Sigh. This should read "To be clear, the proposal here is to have the bridge release be 3.3 and then move on to a ZK-free 4.0. With a 3.4 release as an option (but not requirement) if we can't finish everything in time after 3.3." So much for being clear, I guess :) cheers, Colin > best, > Colin > >> >> [1] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan >> [2] https://kafka.apache.org/downloads >> >> >> Israel Ekpo >> Lead Instructor, IzzyAcademy.com >> https://www.youtube.com/c/izzyacademy >> https://izzyacademy.com/ >> >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:32 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Colin, >>> >>> So exciting to see the KIP to mark the Kraft production ready! >>> >>> Just one comment: We should make sure the period between ZK deprecation >>> (i.e. v3.4.0) to ZK removal (i.e. v4.0.0) is not too short. >>> Do we have any expectation for the deprecation period? >>> After all, this is not a small feature change, and users need more time to >>> do the migration. >>> But to be honest, I don't know how long is long enough. >>> Maybe at least half a year? Or more? Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Luke >>> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 9:10 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I've written a KIP for marking KRaft as production ready. Please take a >>> > look if you have a chance: >>> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/8xKhD >>> > >>> > thanks, >>> > Colin >>> > >>>
