Oops, hit send too soon. I see that #15127 was already merged. So we should no 
longer be publishing :metadata as part of the clients artifacts, right?

thanks,
Colin


On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, at 11:42, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Apporv,
>
> Please remove the metadata module from any artifacts published for 
> clients. It is only used by the server.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2024, at 03:04, Apoorv Mittal wrote:
>> Hi Colin,
>> Thanks for the response. The only reason for asking the question of
>> publishing the metadata is because that's present in previous client
>> releases. For more context, the description of PR
>> <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15127> holds the details and waiting
>> for the confirmation there prior to the merge.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Apoorv Mittal
>> +44 7721681581
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:22 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> metadata is an internal gradle module. It is not used by clients. So I
>>> don't see why you would want to publish it (unless I'm misunderstanding
>>> something).
>>>
>>> best,
>>> Colin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, at 10:05, Stanislav Kozlovski wrote:
>>> > Thanks for reporting the blockers, folks. Good job finding.
>>> >
>>> > I have one ask - can anybody with Gradle expertise help review this small
>>> > PR? https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15127 (+1, -1)
>>> > In particular, we are wondering whether we need to publish module
>>> metadata
>>> > as part of the gradle publishing process.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:56 PM Proven Provenzano
>>> > <pprovenz...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> We have potentially one more blocker
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16082 which might cause a
>>> data
>>> >> loss scenario with JBOD in KRaft.
>>> >> Initial analysis thought this is a problem and further review looks
>>> like it
>>> >> isn't but we are continuing to dig into the issue to ensure that it
>>> isn't.
>>> >> We would request feedback on the bug from anyone who is familiar with
>>> this
>>> >> code.
>>> >>
>>> >> --Proven
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best,
>>> > Stanislav
>>>

Reply via email to