+1. And we also need to do a better job educating users about our annotations, since such things are likely to happen in KC / KS in the future.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Ismael > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-45. We've discussed several > > alternatives > > > on the mailing list and in the KIP call, but this vote is only on the > > > documented KIP: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61337336. > > > This > > > change will not be compatible with 0.9, but it will provide a cleaner > API > > > long term for users to work with. This is really the last chance to > make > > an > > > incompatible change like this with 0.10 shortly on the way, but > > compatible > > > options (such as method overloading) could be brought up again in the > > > future if we find it's needed. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > Ashish > -- -- Guozhang
