+1 (non-binding) On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
> correcting my mistake - the proposal is wire-compatible, but not source > compatible for some calls. My vote remains though. > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I want to clarify that the compatibility issue is only for unshaded > > dependencies. Code and wire protocol will be compatible. > > > > Gwen > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > >> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-45. We've discussed several > alternatives > >> on the mailing list and in the KIP call, but this vote is only on the > >> documented KIP: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61337336. > >> This > >> change will not be compatible with 0.9, but it will provide a cleaner > API > >> long term for users to work with. This is really the last chance to make > >> an > >> incompatible change like this with 0.10 shortly on the way, but > compatible > >> options (such as method overloading) could be brought up again in the > >> future if we find it's needed. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jason > >> > > > > >
