+1 On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 at 09:03 Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > Thanks, > Harsha > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 05:46 PM, Henry Cai wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > ＋1. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Jason Gustafson < > ja...@confluent.io> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-62. This proposal attempts to > address > > > > one > > > > > of the recurring usability problems that users of the new consumer > have > > > > > faced with as little impact as possible. You can read the full > details > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-62%3A+Allow+consumer+to+send+heartbeats+from+a+background+thread > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > After some discussion on this list, I think we were in agreement > that > > > > this > > > > > change addresses a major part of the problem and we've left the > door > > > open > > > > > for further improvements, such as adding a heartbeat() API or a > > > > separately > > > > > configured rebalance timeout. Thanks in advance to everyone who > helped > > > > > review the proposal. > > > > > > > > > > -Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > >
