>
>
> @Joel,
>
> I read over your wiki, and apart from the introduction of the notion of
> journal partitions --whose pros and cons are already being discussed-- you
> also introduce the notion of a 'producer group' which enables multiple
> producers to participate in a single transaction. This is completely
> opposite of the model in the KIP where a transaction is defined by a
> producer id, and hence there is a 1-1 mapping between producers and
> transactions. Further, each producer can have exactly one in-flight
> transaction at a time in the KIP.
>

Hi Apurva - yes I did notice those differences among other things :) BTW, I
haven't yet gone through the google-doc carefully but on a skim it does not
seem to contain any rejected alternatives as the wiki states.

Reply via email to