Hi Tom, That is a good point. During the discussion, it was agreed that changes to public interfaces (message format, protocol, ACLs, etc.) would be copied to the wiki once the things had settled down, but it looks like that hasn't been done yet. I agree that it makes sense to do it before people vote on it.
Ismael On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com> wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > I've been slow at keeping up with the KIP and the discussion thread. This > is an exciting and quite complex new feature, which provides great new > functionality. > > There's a thing I noticed missing from the KIP that's present in the google > doc - the doc talks about ACLs for TransactionalId. If those are going to > land with the KIP, I think they should be included in the KIP itself, as > new ACLs are significant security changes. > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). > > > > Excellent work and discussions! > > > > Eno > > > On 2 Feb 2017, at 04:13, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We would like to start the voting process for KIP-98. The KIP can be > > found > > > at > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 98+-+Exactly+Once+Delivery+and+Transactional+Messaging > > > > > > Discussion thread can be found here: > > > > > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1jwZrr7HRHf?subj=+ > > DISCUSS+KIP+98+Exactly+Once+Delivery+and+Transactional+Messaging > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > -- Guozhang > > > > >
