Thanks Tom, we'll update the wiki to reflect all the movement on the design document. Did you have a specific concern with the new ACLs?
-Jason On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > That is a good point. During the discussion, it was agreed that changes to > public interfaces (message format, protocol, ACLs, etc.) would be copied to > the wiki once the things had settled down, but it looks like that hasn't > been done yet. I agree that it makes sense to do it before people vote on > it. > > Ismael > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com> wrote: > > > -1 (non-binding) > > > > I've been slow at keeping up with the KIP and the discussion thread. This > > is an exciting and quite complex new feature, which provides great new > > functionality. > > > > There's a thing I noticed missing from the KIP that's present in the > google > > doc - the doc talks about ACLs for TransactionalId. If those are going to > > land with the KIP, I think they should be included in the KIP itself, as > > new ACLs are significant security changes. > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding). > > > > > > Excellent work and discussions! > > > > > > Eno > > > > On 2 Feb 2017, at 04:13, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > We would like to start the voting process for KIP-98. The KIP can be > > > found > > > > at > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 98+-+Exactly+Once+Delivery+and+Transactional+Messaging > > > > > > > > Discussion thread can be found here: > > > > > > > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1jwZrr7HRHf?subj=+ > > > DISCUSS+KIP+98+Exactly+Once+Delivery+and+Transactional+Messaging > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > >
