Hi Charly,

Personally I prefer emitting both and deprecate old one. This does not
block on the 2.0 release and we don't need to worry about more users
picking up the old metric in 1.1 release.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:08 AM, charly molter <charly.mol...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Jun and Becket!
>
> I think your point about 1.0 vs 2.0 makes sense I can update the KIP to
> reflect this.
>
> What's the process for 2.0 contributions as I can see that trunk is 1.1 and
> no 2.x branch?
>
> Here's what I can do:
> - Not write the code change until trunk moves to 2.0.
> - Write the change but leave the PR open until we start working on 2.0.
> - Stall this KIP until 2.0 development starts (IIRC it's pretty soon).
> - Do it in a backward compatible way (publish both sets of metrics) and
> open a Jira tagged on 2.0 to remove the old metrics.
>
> Let me know what's the right way to go.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP, Charly.
> >
> > +1. The proposal looks good to me. I agree with Jun that it is better to
> > make the metrics consistent with other metrics. That being said, arguably
> > this is a backwards incompatible change. Since we are at 1.0, backwards
> > incompatible changes are supposed to be in 2.0. Not sure if that is the
> > plan or not.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Jiangjie,
> > >
> > > Since you proposed the original KIP-92, do you want to see if this KIP
> > > makes sense?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:48 AM, charly molter <
> charly.mol...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start the voting thread for KIP-225.
> > > > This KIP proposes to correct some lag metrics emitted by the
> consumer.
> > > >
> > > > The KIP wiki is here:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/uaBzB
> > > >
> > > > The discussion thread is here:
> > > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1F33uL19AYx/threaded
> > > >
> > > > Also could someone assign me to this Jira: KAFKA-5890
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5890>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --
> > > > Charly Molter
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charly Molter
>

Reply via email to