Hi Jan,
As discussed, I’ve adopted the position that MessageChooser is orthogonal to
topic prioritization and hence outside the scope of KIP-349.
--
Nick
> On Jan 14, 2019, at 12:47 AM, Jan Filipiak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 14.01.2019 02:48, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On reflection, it would be hard to describe the semantics of an API that
>> tried to address starvation by temporarily disabling prioritization, and
>> then oscillating back and forth.
>> Thus I agree that it makes sense not to try and address starvation to
>> Mathias’ point that this is intended by design. The KIP has been updated to
>> reflect this by removing the second method.
>>
>
> The semantics of almost everything are hard to describe with only those
> two tools at hand. Just here to remember yall that Samza already shows
> us the interface of a powerful enough abstraction to get stuff done :)
>
> https://samza.apache.org/learn/documentation/0.12/api/javadocs/org/apache/samza/system/chooser/MessageChooser.html
>
> <https://samza.apache.org/learn/documentation/0.12/api/javadocs/org/apache/samza/system/chooser/MessageChooser.html>
>
> welcome :)
