TBH I personally would rather prefer: - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0 - Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
or - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0 I know that both options are not really optimal, but I don't think that we really want to upgrade the inner core of the entire thing to the next major version in a minor of Karaf. There where some API changes from a user lvl of view which disallow to drop the same bundle into a 4.2/4.3 environment and a 5.0. I do not really fancy the idea of breaking compatibility between minor releases. If ppls setup break from one minor to the next they lost trust and upgrade ways too late although there should be no reason. WDYT? Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi team, > > As you know, OSGi core 5.0.0 has been released. > > I would like to discuss about which version of Karaf should support which > version of the OSGi core (and so the corresponding OSGi frameworks). > > I have the following proposal: > > - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 > - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 > - Karaf 3.0.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 > - Karaf 3.1.x => OSGi core 5.0.0 > > I would wait Karaf 3.1.x to update to OSGi core 5.0.0 as the OSGi frameworks > are not yet fully ready on this specification. > > WDYT ? > > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
