The first solution sounds good to me.
Regards
JB
On 08/18/2012 07:19 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
TBH I personally would rather prefer:
- Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
- Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
or
- Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
- Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
I know that both options are not really optimal, but I don't think
that we really want to upgrade the inner core of the entire thing to
the next major version in a minor of Karaf. There where some API
changes from a user lvl of view which disallow to drop the same bundle
into a 4.2/4.3 environment and a 5.0. I do not really fancy the idea
of breaking compatibility between minor releases. If ppls setup break
from one minor to the next they lost trust and upgrade ways too late
although there should be no reason.
WDYT?
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
Hi team,
As you know, OSGi core 5.0.0 has been released.
I would like to discuss about which version of Karaf should support which
version of the OSGi core (and so the corresponding OSGi frameworks).
I have the following proposal:
- Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
- Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.0.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.1.x => OSGi core 5.0.0
I would wait Karaf 3.1.x to update to OSGi core 5.0.0 as the OSGi frameworks
are not yet fully ready on this specification.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
