I've no problem with either of those since the 4.3 release of the core does not break backward compatibility (compared to 5.0) --> also fine with that approach (BUT, AFAIK 2.3.x had been ported to 4.3 already)
Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> wrote: > I like Andreas first proposal but with a minor change: > > - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 >> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 (at some point we need to deliver new >> features, without changing the world. For 4.3.0 in the 2.x branches maybe >> we could have a 2.4.x, 2.5.x version of Karaf) >> > - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0 >> - Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0 >> > > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Twitter: iocanel > *
