Yes, quite interesting. Finer grained control can't hurt as long as its very well documented.
Cheers, Jamie On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > interesting. I will take a look on the patch tomorrow afternoon. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > > On 09/27/2012 06:58 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> >> First of all, just to bring everyone at the same lvl: If we install >> features all bundles in the feature(s) are installed and then started >> one after the other, in the order as they had been defined in the >> features. >> >> While in theory it should not happen there are situations where we (in >> our software) depend that those features are started at least per >> feature in the order in which they had been added. If I understand the >> CXF feature structure correctly it's also required for them. By a bug >> last week on the trunk I discovered this explicit requirement for our >> software. Starting by this discovery we've started a discussion if it >> wouldn't be better if we consider the startLvl during the feature >> startup. So, I hacked up a solution and tested it with several >> different softwares I've access to and it seamed to work pretty well. >> >> I've attached the patch to [1] and would really like to hear what you >> think about it. >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1878 >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
