Thanks for the update buddy. So, I will do the following today:
- bump master to 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT - create a branch 7.0.x based on 6.1.x - upgrade to Jetty 9.4 on both master and 7.0.x Regards JB On 02/01/2018 09:56 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi, > > it's been me asking for a bump to 7 for Pax Web when using Jetty 9.4 with > full J9 support. > I'm not that much involved in it anymore so my idea might be overruled by > anyone knowing it better. > The point for me to do a Pax Web 7, with Jetty 9.4 is: > - jetty 9.4 does have some Major changes, so isn't really minor version > compatible anymore > - jetty 9.4 is now fully functional on J9, while jetty 9.3 was working > > To reflect these I requested to use version 7, and initially I thought I > would be able to actually push also on the new OSGi R7 stuff. > But I have to face it, my day job doesn't give me the freedom anymore to > actually work on any open source project right now. > The only thing I'm able to to is to watch the mailinglists and sometimes > give a hint or two :/ > > So feel free to call the version anything that feels better to you, I just > don't have the "stakes" at it any longer. > > > regards, Achim > > > 2018-02-01 8:43 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > >> OK, one more thing about pax-web and pax-cdi. >> >> I tried upgrading some versions in pax-cdi and while weld / pax-cdi itself >> doesn't have problems working with ASM6 / xbean-asm6-shaded (as weld uses >> own proxy generator from JBoss classwriter), there's problem with >> openwebbeans... 1.x version is CDI 1.2, but uses xbean-asm5-shaded. >> Openwebbeans 2.x uses xbean-asm6-shaded BUT it's CDI 2.0 implementation... >> >> I don't have good solution here. pax-web 6.x already uses asm6 which seems >> to be backward (down to JDK8) compatible... I don't think dropping >> Openwebbeans 1.x support in pax-cdi 1.0.0 is good idea... >> >> regards >> Grzegorz Grzybek >> >> 2018-02-01 8:16 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Good idea. pax-web 7 won't differ much from 6.1, but it's ok. >>> >>> regards >>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>> >>> 2018-02-01 8:04 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: >>> >>>> My concern is more about the Jetty 9.4 update. >>>> >>>> In that case, I would propose: >>>> >>>> 1. Bump master to Pax Web 8.0.x >>>> 2. Create a branch Pax Web 7.0.x based on 6.x >>>> 3. Upgrade to Jetty 9.4 in both master and 7.0.x branch. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 02/01/2018 08:01 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >>>>> pax-web 7 (master branch) is now using jetty 9.3.21.v20170918. >>>>> >>>>> Actually I'm not trying to tie pax-web releases to JavaEE releases. I >>>> see >>>>> that master branch (7.0.0-SNAPSHOT) now uses some OSGi R7 JAX-RS >>>>> samples/whiteboard and I don't think it's production-ready yet. >>>>> >>>>> In other words - I don't think we should have Karaf 4.2 using pax-web >>>> 7.0.0 >>>>> due to this OSGi R7 stuff. >>>>> >>>>> Also, pax-web 6 already uses ASM6, so it should be (probably) Java9 >>>> ready. >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> Grzegorz >>>>> >>>>> 2018-02-01 7:57 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1...@yahoo.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Wasn't Pax-web 7 the version with Jetty 9.4.x support? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Andrea Cosentino >>>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member >>>>>> Apache Karaf Committer >>>>>> Apache Servicemix PMC Member >>>>>> Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com >>>>>> Twitter: @oscerd2 >>>>>> Github: oscerd >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, February 1, 2018, 7:53:49 AM GMT+1, Grzegorz Grzybek < >>>>>> gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello >>>>>> >>>>>> On PAX-WEB side (and wrt PAX-CDI), I did some important, but >>>> norrow-scoped >>>>>> changes related to pax-cdi integration. Generally pax-web-jetty now >>>> allows >>>>>> to run JSF/CDI WARs without problems (at least MyFaces + Weld). There >>>> was >>>>>> minor change needed in pax-web itself and a bit bigger change in >>>> pax-cdi. >>>>>> >>>>>> I know pax-cdi is not that popular, but still - having 1.0.0.RCx for >> ~5 >>>>>> years now isn't nice ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> As for pax-web 6.1.x upgrade to Jetty 9.4 - I'm OK, as (after I think >>>> I've >>>>>> collected the right information here >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TB_q5r9i8DOIHmBQa1_ >>>>>> RjsrcjWCwCwsLPj3Pc6FoTJ8/edit#gid=1455909167> >>>>>> - see both sheets) Jetty 9.4.x is still Servlets 3.1/JavaEE 7. >>>>>> >>>>>> best regards >>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>>>>> >>>>>> 2018-01-31 20:59 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a quick update on the release schedule. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you probably saw, I canceled the Decanter 2.0.0 vote today. I >> will >>>> fix >>>>>>> the two pending issues: I should be able to submit a new 2.0.0 >>>> release to >>>>>>> vote tomorrow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For Cellar releases, I need more time as some changes are wider than >>>>>>> expected. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding "container", before 4.2.0 release (still planned in couple >>>> of >>>>>>> weeks), I would like to prepare a 4.1.5 release pretty soon >> (probably >>>> for >>>>>>> the weekend). We did good fixes and improvements valuable for users, >>>> so >>>>>> it >>>>>>> makes sense to cut a release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 24/01/2018 15:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just a quick update about the coming releases. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Apache Karaf Decanter 2.0.0 >>>>>>>> I'm working right now on the Decanter 2.0.0 release. It's a major >> new >>>>>>>> releases >>>>>>>> (from the new Decanter 2.x series). We are on the right track for >>>> this >>>>>>>> release, >>>>>>>> I should be able to submit to vote during the weekend. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2. Karaf Cellar 4.0.4/4.1.2 >>>>>>>> Some PRs have been merged and I'm reviewing a larger PR. I also >> have >>>>>>>> several >>>>>>>> fixes and little improvements on the way. I plan to submit releases >>>> to >>>>>>>> vote in >>>>>>>> roughly 2 weeks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 3. Karaf "Container" 4.2.0 >>>>>>>> After 4.2.0.M1 and 4.2.0.M2, I think we are pretty close to 4.2.0 >>>>>>>> release. We >>>>>>>> still have 18 issues to qualify and eventually fix for this >> release. >>>> One >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> important one is that we have to upgrade to Pax Web 6.1.2 that >> should >>>>>>>> upgrade to >>>>>>>> Jetty 9.4.6. It's important to be aligned with latest Camel >> releases. >>>>>>>> So, I started the Jira triage and also started the Pax Web Jetty >>>>>> ugprade. >>>>>>>> I don't have strong dates in mind for now but hopefully, we should >> be >>>>>>>> able to >>>>>>>> cut 4.2.0 in roughly 2 weeks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
