2018-02-01 10:03 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
> Thanks for the update buddy. > > So, I will do the following today: > > - bump master to 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT > - create a branch 7.0.x based on 6.1.x > - upgrade to Jetty 9.4 on both master and 7.0.x > amen! +1 thanks for explanation regards Grzegorz > Regards > JB > > On 02/01/2018 09:56 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it's been me asking for a bump to 7 for Pax Web when using Jetty 9.4 with > > full J9 support. > > I'm not that much involved in it anymore so my idea might be overruled by > > anyone knowing it better. > > The point for me to do a Pax Web 7, with Jetty 9.4 is: > > - jetty 9.4 does have some Major changes, so isn't really minor version > > compatible anymore > > - jetty 9.4 is now fully functional on J9, while jetty 9.3 was working > > > > To reflect these I requested to use version 7, and initially I thought I > > would be able to actually push also on the new OSGi R7 stuff. > > But I have to face it, my day job doesn't give me the freedom anymore to > > actually work on any open source project right now. > > The only thing I'm able to to is to watch the mailinglists and sometimes > > give a hint or two :/ > > > > So feel free to call the version anything that feels better to you, I > just > > don't have the "stakes" at it any longer. > > > > > > regards, Achim > > > > > > 2018-02-01 8:43 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > > > >> OK, one more thing about pax-web and pax-cdi. > >> > >> I tried upgrading some versions in pax-cdi and while weld / pax-cdi > itself > >> doesn't have problems working with ASM6 / xbean-asm6-shaded (as weld > uses > >> own proxy generator from JBoss classwriter), there's problem with > >> openwebbeans... 1.x version is CDI 1.2, but uses xbean-asm5-shaded. > >> Openwebbeans 2.x uses xbean-asm6-shaded BUT it's CDI 2.0 > implementation... > >> > >> I don't have good solution here. pax-web 6.x already uses asm6 which > seems > >> to be backward (down to JDK8) compatible... I don't think dropping > >> Openwebbeans 1.x support in pax-cdi 1.0.0 is good idea... > >> > >> regards > >> Grzegorz Grzybek > >> > >> 2018-02-01 8:16 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> Good idea. pax-web 7 won't differ much from 6.1, but it's ok. > >>> > >>> regards > >>> Grzegorz Grzybek > >>> > >>> 2018-02-01 8:04 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > >>> > >>>> My concern is more about the Jetty 9.4 update. > >>>> > >>>> In that case, I would propose: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Bump master to Pax Web 8.0.x > >>>> 2. Create a branch Pax Web 7.0.x based on 6.x > >>>> 3. Upgrade to Jetty 9.4 in both master and 7.0.x branch. > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts ? > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> On 02/01/2018 08:01 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > >>>>> pax-web 7 (master branch) is now using jetty 9.3.21.v20170918. > >>>>> > >>>>> Actually I'm not trying to tie pax-web releases to JavaEE releases. I > >>>> see > >>>>> that master branch (7.0.0-SNAPSHOT) now uses some OSGi R7 JAX-RS > >>>>> samples/whiteboard and I don't think it's production-ready yet. > >>>>> > >>>>> In other words - I don't think we should have Karaf 4.2 using pax-web > >>>> 7.0.0 > >>>>> due to this OSGi R7 stuff. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, pax-web 6 already uses ASM6, so it should be (probably) Java9 > >>>> ready. > >>>>> > >>>>> regards > >>>>> Grzegorz > >>>>> > >>>>> 2018-02-01 7:57 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1...@yahoo.com>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Wasn't Pax-web 7 the version with Jetty 9.4.x support? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Andrea Cosentino > >>>>>> ---------------------------------- > >>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member > >>>>>> Apache Karaf Committer > >>>>>> Apache Servicemix PMC Member > >>>>>> Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > >>>>>> Twitter: @oscerd2 > >>>>>> Github: oscerd > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thursday, February 1, 2018, 7:53:49 AM GMT+1, Grzegorz Grzybek < > >>>>>> gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On PAX-WEB side (and wrt PAX-CDI), I did some important, but > >>>> norrow-scoped > >>>>>> changes related to pax-cdi integration. Generally pax-web-jetty now > >>>> allows > >>>>>> to run JSF/CDI WARs without problems (at least MyFaces + Weld). > There > >>>> was > >>>>>> minor change needed in pax-web itself and a bit bigger change in > >>>> pax-cdi. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I know pax-cdi is not that popular, but still - having 1.0.0.RCx for > >> ~5 > >>>>>> years now isn't nice ;) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As for pax-web 6.1.x upgrade to Jetty 9.4 - I'm OK, as (after I > think > >>>> I've > >>>>>> collected the right information here > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TB_q5r9i8DOIHmBQa1_ > >>>>>> RjsrcjWCwCwsLPj3Pc6FoTJ8/edit#gid=1455909167> > >>>>>> - see both sheets) Jetty 9.4.x is still Servlets 3.1/JavaEE 7. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> best regards > >>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2018-01-31 20:59 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> a quick update on the release schedule. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As you probably saw, I canceled the Decanter 2.0.0 vote today. I > >> will > >>>> fix > >>>>>>> the two pending issues: I should be able to submit a new 2.0.0 > >>>> release to > >>>>>>> vote tomorrow. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For Cellar releases, I need more time as some changes are wider > than > >>>>>>> expected. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regarding "container", before 4.2.0 release (still planned in > couple > >>>> of > >>>>>>> weeks), I would like to prepare a 4.1.5 release pretty soon > >> (probably > >>>> for > >>>>>>> the weekend). We did good fixes and improvements valuable for > users, > >>>> so > >>>>>> it > >>>>>>> makes sense to cut a release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 24/01/2018 15:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Just a quick update about the coming releases. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. Apache Karaf Decanter 2.0.0 > >>>>>>>> I'm working right now on the Decanter 2.0.0 release. It's a major > >> new > >>>>>>>> releases > >>>>>>>> (from the new Decanter 2.x series). We are on the right track for > >>>> this > >>>>>>>> release, > >>>>>>>> I should be able to submit to vote during the weekend. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2. Karaf Cellar 4.0.4/4.1.2 > >>>>>>>> Some PRs have been merged and I'm reviewing a larger PR. I also > >> have > >>>>>>>> several > >>>>>>>> fixes and little improvements on the way. I plan to submit > releases > >>>> to > >>>>>>>> vote in > >>>>>>>> roughly 2 weeks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 3. Karaf "Container" 4.2.0 > >>>>>>>> After 4.2.0.M1 and 4.2.0.M2, I think we are pretty close to 4.2.0 > >>>>>>>> release. We > >>>>>>>> still have 18 issues to qualify and eventually fix for this > >> release. > >>>> One > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>> important one is that we have to upgrade to Pax Web 6.1.2 that > >> should > >>>>>>>> upgrade to > >>>>>>>> Jetty 9.4.6. It's important to be aligned with latest Camel > >> releases. > >>>>>>>> So, I started the Jira triage and also started the Pax Web Jetty > >>>>>> ugprade. > >>>>>>>> I don't have strong dates in mind for now but hopefully, we should > >> be > >>>>>>>> able to > >>>>>>>> cut 4.2.0 in roughly 2 weeks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
