On 17/01/2019 19:46, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > I understand. I don't remember (wasn't there when pax-logging was founded), > but it's about those exotic appenders you can use. > But in OSGi, it'd be probably better to rewrite/adjust the > discover/extensibility part in pax-logging-log4j2, to use our beloved TCCL > instead or kind of service discovery / locator.
Yes, and also it would be nice to have a basic slim core jar and have rest optionally delivered -- I bet most deployments would use much less than 1.8MiB this is currently costing... Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
