On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 14:37 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: > top posting, yaay! > I have a new server sort of set up now. I'll have infra redirect to > that > one instead, and it'll rebuild most of the database during the night > (and the next night, and...). > > there's a new option, a path filter in the repos tab, which filters > commits, line changes, trends, top contributors etc by paths > affected, > so you can enter either 'jbake' to get everything touching jbake, or > '!jbake' to get everything that doesn't touch those files. > > The CNAME should switch over some time today :)
Cool, thanks! I'll give this a shot later. Robert > > With regards, > Daniel. > > PS: We're also switching to elasticsearch 6 with this move, which is > going to be great, as that allows us to test on a modern ES, instead > of > the old 5.x installation we're currently running on. > > On 09/12/2018 12:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 09/12/2018 12:22 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > > > > > If you look at the sling-site repository at [1] we have the > > > actual > > > documentation under src/main/jbake, with > > > - content being markdown files > > > - templates being ... well ... templates > > > - and assets being static files > > > > > > Some of those static files are generated (javadoc, Maven plugin > > > sites) > > > and should not be recorded by Kiddle. Those are the ones that are > > > problematic, especially since we have a large number of javadocs > > > committed. > > > > > > $ find src/main/jbake/assets/apidocs -type f | wc -l > > > 7127 > > > > > > Those are the ones we'd like excluded, if at all possible. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > [1]: > > > https://github.com/apache/sling-site/tree/master/src/main/jbake > > > > > > > > > > I've added a change to the scanners, so they will put a list of > > files > > changes into each commit object we record. This is likely going to > > require a complete re-scan of all things sling...which in theory > > is > > fine, as I _was_ planning on moving the demo server to a new box > > anyway. > > I'll let y'all know more when I have that worked out in my mind :) > > After the move and re-scan, it should be possible to exclude by > > file paths. > >
