Hi Alex! Many thanks for putting this together, I liked the plan.
Qs: 1. Do we have tasks/people assigned for this plan, or an estimate to put this together? 2. Not sure if I understood. Are we releasing .45 or not? The plan is to release only the 10.x train in the new home? Thank u! -- On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:50 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote: > This new email thread aims to formalize the proposal that has emerged > during the recent discussions in the Quarkus v3 thread started by Mario > [1]. > > The proposal consists of the following items for the first Apache KIE > podling release: > > 1. Have all repositories of Apache KIE aligned in a single version 10.x > > 2. The 10.x stream will only cover Jakarta 10 and forward (Quarkus 3 and > SpringBoot v3). > > Suggested steps: > > 1. Communication: Write a blog post about the Apache move, including a > section on what's expected to change, mentioning the versioning > re-alignment on 10.x, and focusing on Jakarta 10 only moving forward. > > 2. Keep working on CI to get the current 8.45/1.45 ready to be released. > Although we don't plan to release a .45, throwing more changes in the CI > work doesn't make sense before having a basic baseline ready to be > released. > > 3. Once we are "ready" to release 8.45/1.45, we branch it but won't release > > 4. We upgrade all repos to 10.0.0 and apply the OpenRewrite directly into > that for the last time. > > 5. We fix the remaining issues on main caused by OpenRewrite open issues. > > 6. We run sanity tests to ensure that 10 will work as expected with Quarkus > 3 > > F.A.Q. > > Q: Why align everything on 10? > A: Simplify the message and better align with the Apache KIE proposal that > defines Apache KIE as the project and other brands as sub-modules. > > Q: If we have 8.45/1.45 ready to release, why not release it before moving > to 10? > A: This is also to be clear on communication and message. Having a single > release of 8.45/1.45 in Apache and right away, moving to 10 is very > confusing. > > Q: Why use 10 and not 9? > A: As pointed out by Mario in the Quarkus thread [1][2], we already had a > 9.44.0.Final release. Recycling it would break semantic versioning. > > [1] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lz4bkrdlrfvx2ktppl7o735hq9g7f8jx > [2] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lbyorkyfsd3rng48z3pjhn10pwm2b0hm >
