Ricardo, I recommend another “[PROPOSAL]” thread for discuss renames.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:09 AM ricardo zanini fernandes < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 Mario, Pere, whatever you guys need please let me know where I can help! > > Aside, we also need to rename a few Quarkus Add-ons (GAV, name, and > description) to reflect the SonataFlow project (the SW implementation). Can > we discuss this here or should I open a new thread? > > Cheers! > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:17 AM Pere Fernandez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 good, looks like a plan. > > > > I can help to fix the Openrewrite scripts & patches, already did some > fixes > > in some repos. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Pere > > > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 08:56, Mario Fusco <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 also for me. If we communicate this clearly this will give us a > fresh > > > start that is totally coherent with the apache migration. > > > > > > If it's ok for you, I can take care of starting writing down a short > > > article to explain the situation. For now I'll put it on a shared > Google > > > docs so everybody could comment and edit it before publishing. By the > > way, > > > do we have a place where to publish this and other article in future? > Is > > > the old Kie blog still ok or do we need something different? > > > > > > If we all agree on this, the next step to be taken for what regards our > > > code base is branching the current main branches and apply to the new > > ones > > > the openrewrite migration scripts one last time, so we could all > finally > > > working on a proper Quarkus 3 integration. Is there any volunteer to do > > > this? I'm not totally familiar with those migration script and even > less > > > with the CI implications, but I'm available to help for what I can. > > Please > > > let's coordinate on this asap. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mario > > > > > > On 2023/10/19 04:55:28 Tibor Zimányi wrote: > > > > +1 from me. Makes sense. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > Dňa 18. októbra 2023 22:49:48 SELČ používateľ Alex Porcelli < > > > [email protected]> napísal: > > > > >This new email thread aims to formalize the proposal that has > emerged > > > > >during the recent discussions in the Quarkus v3 thread started by > > Mario > > > [1]. > > > > > > > > > >The proposal consists of the following items for the first Apache > KIE > > > > >podling release: > > > > > > > > > >1. Have all repositories of Apache KIE aligned in a single version > > 10.x > > > > > > > > > >2. The 10.x stream will only cover Jakarta 10 and forward (Quarkus 3 > > and > > > > >SpringBoot v3). > > > > > > > > > >Suggested steps: > > > > > > > > > >1. Communication: Write a blog post about the Apache move, > including a > > > > >section on what's expected to change, mentioning the versioning > > > > >re-alignment on 10.x, and focusing on Jakarta 10 only moving > forward. > > > > > > > > > >2. Keep working on CI to get the current 8.45/1.45 ready to be > > released. > > > > >Although we don't plan to release a .45, throwing more changes in > the > > CI > > > > >work doesn't make sense before having a basic baseline ready to be > > > released. > > > > > > > > > >3. Once we are "ready" to release 8.45/1.45, we branch it but won't > > > release > > > > > > > > > >4. We upgrade all repos to 10.0.0 and apply the OpenRewrite directly > > > into > > > > >that for the last time. > > > > > > > > > >5. We fix the remaining issues on main caused by OpenRewrite open > > > issues. > > > > > > > > > >6. We run sanity tests to ensure that 10 will work as expected with > > > Quarkus > > > > >3 > > > > > > > > > >F.A.Q. > > > > > > > > > >Q: Why align everything on 10? > > > > >A: Simplify the message and better align with the Apache KIE > proposal > > > that > > > > >defines Apache KIE as the project and other brands as sub-modules. > > > > > > > > > >Q: If we have 8.45/1.45 ready to release, why not release it before > > > moving > > > > >to 10? > > > > >A: This is also to be clear on communication and message. Having a > > > single > > > > >release of 8.45/1.45 in Apache and right away, moving to 10 is very > > > > >confusing. > > > > > > > > > >Q: Why use 10 and not 9? > > > > >A: As pointed out by Mario in the Quarkus thread [1][2], we already > > had > > > a > > > > >9.44.0.Final release. Recycling it would break semantic versioning. > > > > > > > > > >[1] - > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lz4bkrdlrfvx2ktppl7o735hq9g7f8jx > > > > >[2] - > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lbyorkyfsd3rng48z3pjhn10pwm2b0hm > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
