+1 Mario, Pere, whatever you guys need please let me know where I can help!

Aside, we also need to rename a few Quarkus Add-ons (GAV, name, and
description) to reflect the SonataFlow project (the SW implementation). Can
we discuss this here or should I open a new thread?

Cheers!



On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:17 AM Pere Fernandez <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 good, looks like a plan.
>
> I can help to fix the Openrewrite scripts & patches, already did some fixes
> in some repos.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pere
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 08:56, Mario Fusco <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 also for me. If we communicate this clearly this will give us a fresh
> > start that is totally coherent with the apache migration.
> >
> > If it's ok for you, I can take care of starting writing down a short
> > article to explain the situation. For now I'll put it on a shared Google
> > docs so everybody could comment and edit it before publishing. By the
> way,
> > do we have a place where to publish this and other article in future? Is
> > the old Kie blog still ok or do we need something different?
> >
> > If we all agree on this, the next step to be taken for what regards our
> > code base is branching the current main branches and apply to the new
> ones
> > the openrewrite migration scripts one last time, so we could all finally
> > working on a proper Quarkus 3 integration. Is there any volunteer to do
> > this? I'm not totally familiar with those migration script and even less
> > with the CI implications, but I'm available to help for what I can.
> Please
> > let's coordinate on this asap.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mario
> >
> > On 2023/10/19 04:55:28 Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> > > +1 from me. Makes sense.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tibor
> > >
> > > Dňa 18. októbra 2023 22:49:48 SELČ používateľ Alex Porcelli <
> > [email protected]> napísal:
> > > >This new email thread aims to formalize the proposal that has emerged
> > > >during the recent discussions in the Quarkus v3 thread started by
> Mario
> > [1].
> > > >
> > > >The proposal consists of the following items for the first Apache KIE
> > > >podling release:
> > > >
> > > >1. Have all repositories of Apache KIE aligned in a single version
> 10.x
> > > >
> > > >2. The 10.x stream will only cover Jakarta 10 and forward (Quarkus 3
> and
> > > >SpringBoot v3).
> > > >
> > > >Suggested steps:
> > > >
> > > >1. Communication: Write a blog post about the Apache move, including a
> > > >section on what's expected to change, mentioning the versioning
> > > >re-alignment on 10.x, and focusing on Jakarta 10 only moving forward.
> > > >
> > > >2. Keep working on CI to get the current 8.45/1.45 ready to be
> released.
> > > >Although we don't plan to release a .45, throwing more changes in the
> CI
> > > >work doesn't make sense before having a basic baseline ready to be
> > released.
> > > >
> > > >3. Once we are "ready" to release 8.45/1.45, we branch it but won't
> > release
> > > >
> > > >4. We upgrade all repos to 10.0.0 and apply the OpenRewrite directly
> > into
> > > >that for the last time.
> > > >
> > > >5. We fix the remaining issues on main caused by OpenRewrite open
> > issues.
> > > >
> > > >6. We run sanity tests to ensure that 10 will work as expected with
> > Quarkus
> > > >3
> > > >
> > > >F.A.Q.
> > > >
> > > >Q: Why align everything on 10?
> > > >A: Simplify the message and better align with the Apache KIE proposal
> > that
> > > >defines Apache KIE as the project and other brands as sub-modules.
> > > >
> > > >Q: If we have 8.45/1.45 ready to release, why not release it before
> > moving
> > > >to 10?
> > > >A: This is also to be clear on communication and message. Having a
> > single
> > > >release of 8.45/1.45 in Apache and right away, moving to 10 is very
> > > >confusing.
> > > >
> > > >Q: Why use 10 and not 9?
> > > >A: As pointed out by Mario in the Quarkus thread [1][2], we already
> had
> > a
> > > >9.44.0.Final release. Recycling it would break semantic versioning.
> > > >
> > > >[1] -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/lz4bkrdlrfvx2ktppl7o735hq9g7f8jx
> > > >[2] -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/lbyorkyfsd3rng48z3pjhn10pwm2b0hm
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to