Hi Mario,

based on this I think the CI is already using Java 17 (1). If that is not
the case I could take a look.

As far as Java 17 I agree we should target Java 17. Recently even newer LTS
Java was released (21) so I think 17 is fine.

Best regards,
Tibor

(1)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/blob/main/apache-nodes/Dockerfile.kogito-ci-build#L5


Dňa po 27. 11. 2023, 9:05 Mario Fusco <[email protected]> napísal(a):

> Thanks for the recap of the situation Toshiya,
>
> I was struggling trying to make kogito-runtimes to work with Java 11, but
> at this point this seems to be a wasteful effort if we decide to go with 17
> as I also warmly suggest.
>
> If there is anybody who thinks that moving to Java 17 is not a good idea,
> please let us know immediately.
>
> Also is there anybody who could migrate the CI to Java 17? I'd really
> appreciate an help on this.
>
> As for the other 2 points (maven and spring-boot versions) I would avoid
> having too many moving parts at this stage, so if version 3.8.7 for maven
> and 3.0.5 for spring-boot are good enough I'd stick with them at least for
> now. We will have time to upgrade them after this migration will be
> finalized.
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
> On 2023/11/27 05:51:29 Toshiya Kobayashi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We'd like to clarify some points for the migration.
> >
> > 1) Java version
> >
> > In the zulip chat, we discussed that we would like to use Java 17 for the
> > minimal version for Quarkus 3.5.2 migration.
> >
> >
> https://kie.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/381961-drools-dev/topic/Quarkus.203.20migration/near/403922014
> >
> > If we have Java 17 as the minimal version, we don't have to downgrade the
> > quarkus-camel (3.0.0-M1 -> 2.15.0) and spring-boot (3.0.5 -> 2.6.6)
> > versions.
> >
> > Do we agree on Java 17 as the minimal version?
> >
> > 2) Maven version
> >
> > This may not be very important.
> >
> > Quarkus 3.5.2 supports "[3.8.2,)"
> > https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/3.5.2/build-parent/pom.xml#L62
> >
> > and recommneds "3.9.5"
> > https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/3.5.2/build-parent/pom.xml#L65
> >
> > Probably "3.9.5" would be nice, but supportable versions would be fine. I
> > just wanted to note here.
> >
> > 2) How to specify Java version in Jenkins CI (at the moment, for PR. But
> > others too)
> >
> > Can we specify the Jenkins Java version at the kogito-runtimes side?
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not just knowledgeable about it. I tested "BUILD_JDK_TOOL" in
> > `.ci/jenkins/Jenkinsfile`, but I cannot even confirm if it's effective.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3292/files#diff-cc7fa003f07626ab6b3e955a24d87913c05aee8bb6c56fc05bf243f617fac962R21
> >
> > Please kindly share the right way to specify that.
> >
> > 3) Spring Boot version
> >
> > Pere mentioned
> >
> > > my guts say that we should upgrade if we have the oportunity but I'm
> > affraid it could add more pain.
> >
> >
> https://kie.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/381961-drools-dev/topic/Quarkus.203.20migration/near/403970518
> >
> > Do we want to upgrade spring-boot higher than 3.0.5?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Toshiya
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 6:36 PM Mario Fusco <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > It would be best to agree on a branch name - if it's quarkus3 - and
> > > > generate special pipelines for that branch. So that we have clear
> > > > separation. It would require branching of whole groups of
> repositories
> > > > (similarly as above - incubator-kie-kogito-apps and others).
> > >
> > > Hi Jan,
> > >
> > > I agree on this. For now I replaced Toshiya's PR and now I have 2 PRs
> with
> > > same branch name so CI could at least run against them, see:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/pull/5589
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3291
> > >
> > > CI is still running, anyway Drools should be ok (or if it isn't I will
> > > take care of it), while kogito-runtimes is finally compiling, but
> locally I
> > > have the 2 test failures that I'm pasting at the end of this email. I'm
> > > working on them, but in all honest I have zero knowledge of that area,
> so I
> > > would really appreciate any help on them.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mario
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin:3.1.2:verify
> > > (integration-test) on project
> > > kogito-quarkus-serverless-workflow-integration-test: There are test
> > > failures.
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Failures:
> > > [ERROR]   EventTimedoutIT.testTimedout:94
> > > expected: 0L
> > >  but was: 1L
> > > [ERROR]   ForEachRestIT.testForEachSubflow:62 1 expectation failed.
> > > Expected status code <201> but was <400>.
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Errors:
> > > [ERROR]   CallbackStateTimeoutsIT.callbackStateTimeoutsExceeded:60 »
> > > ConditionTimeout Assertion condition defined as a
> > > org.kie.kogito.test.utils.ProcessInstancesRESTTestUtils 1 expectation
> > > failed.
> > > Expected status code <404> but was <200>.
> > >  within 10 seconds.
> > > [ERROR]
> > >
> CallbackStateWithTimeoutsErrorHandlerIT.callbackStateTimeoutsExceeded:72 »
> > > ConditionTimeout Assertion condition defined as a
> > > org.kie.kogito.test.utils.ProcessInstancesRESTTestUtils 1 expectation
> > > failed.
> > > Expected status code <404> but was <200>.
> > >  within 10 seconds.
> > > [INFO]
> > > [ERROR] Tests run: 79, Failures: 2, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to