Toshiya, What I mean by temporary is that it’s not a longer term solution, it can be effective for a few releases (similar to what we had for 10.0.0), but we shouldn’t consider it a permanent solution.
Francisco, The issue is on dependency, not comments… as of now there’s a dependency with a Categoxy X software and IPMC made clear its position. On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 5:36 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < [email protected]> wrote: > Also, its not even clear to me if we are even referencing RedPanda beyond a > string in the setup of the IT code. > I do not think that the rule forbids mentioning "Oracle" and "RedPanda" in > the source code (that will be as absurd as not being able to have a comment > mentioning red pandas). What the rule forbids is including, in our > distribution, that software (which we are not doing) > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 7:13 AM Toshiya Kobayashi < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > Removing the test code from source release is a temporary solution, > > > and it's also a manual (error prone!) process. > > > > Does "temporary" mean "until graduating incubator"? > > > > If yes, then removing the test code from source release wouldn't bring > much > > value, because "Has Category X dependencies" is a Minor Issue which also > > gives us time until graduation ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469), so our option seems to > > be > > only one which Ricardo suggested. > > > > Toshiya > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 5:02 AM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Removing the test code from source release is a temporary solution, > > > and it's also a manual (error prone!) process. > > > > > > IPMC has been clear about legal implications in a similar case we had > > > with the Oracle JDBC driver. The mentioned license is CategoryX and > > > can't be referenced. > > > > > > Yes, different TLP might have different interpretations, but IPMC has > > > been clear about theirs for us (again, using the Oracle JDBC as the > > > reference). > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:50 AM Gonzalo Muñoz <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Adding more context to this, Quarkus Kafka Dev services uses Redpanda > > as > > > default option (they also have Strimzi and native Kafka, but have to be > > > opted-in). > > > > The rationale is "Because starting a Kafka broker can be long, Dev > > > Services for Kafka uses Redpanda, a Kafka compatible broker which > starts > > in > > > ~1 second." [1] > > > > > > > > So, for example, in kogito-apps, there was no reference to Redpanda, > > > just the use of Quarkus Kafka Dev Services which delegates as default > to > > > Redpanda. > > > > > > > > [1] https://quarkus.io/guides/kafka-dev-services > > > > > > > > El vie, 13 dic 2024 a las 17:31, ricardo zanini fernandes (< > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> > > > >> Folks, replacing Redpanda with Apache Kafka will deteriorate our > test > > > cases > > > >> since the first is a lightweight version of the Kafka implementation > > [1] > > > >> > > > >> Our tests are already a pain to run, consuming too many resources > from > > > the > > > >> infrastructure. Can't we just NOT distribute the IT sources? > > > >> > > > >> Alternatively, we can remove docker containers and have a Kafka Mock > > [2] > > > >> re-engineering our test architecture slightly and use Apache/Kafka > > ONLY > > > for > > > >> very specific cases (if any). > > > >> > > > >> Let me know what you think, and I will open a vote thread. > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > https://www.redpanda.com/guides/kafka-alternatives-kafka-limitations > > > >> [2] https://www.baeldung.com/kafka-mockproducer > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 6:37 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I vote for B), that way we remove the IT test, if any, from the > > source > > > >> > distribution, which I think is good anyway. because we if w only > > > distribute > > > >> > the actual running code and its sources, we are reducing the size > of > > > the > > > >> > distributable (and in SW, the smaller, if working, the better) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:16 AM Toshiya Kobayashi < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thank you, Andrea. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > As Alex suggested, we would: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > A) Replace redpanda with another container which is under an > > > acceptable > > > >> > > license (e.g. apache/kafka) > > > >> > > or > > > >> > > B) Exclude the relevant test cases from the source distribution > > > >> > > > > > >> > > It will be tracked by > > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1682 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks! > > > >> > > Toshiya > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 7:37 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Based on some inputs we got from IPMC when discussing Oracle > > JDBC > > > >> > > > dependency, the test dependencies on CategoryX are also not > > > allowed. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > The workaround could be that the source is not released and > the > > > >> > binaries > > > >> > > > aren’t directly dependent on those. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 5:28 AM Andrea Cosentino < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> In the past they were excluded. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> At some point the license changed and it was no more in the > > > category > > > >> > X. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> I don't remember the dependency anyway. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Il giorno gio 12 dic 2024 alle ore 11:12 Toshiya Kobayashi < > > > >> > > >> [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Thank you for the reply, Andrea. > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > If the dependency is used just for testing and it's not > > part > > > of > > > >> > the > > > >> > > >> > release, there are no impediments in using it. > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > We were doing something similar in Apache Camel too for > > some > > > >> > > >> > dependencies with license non-compliant with ASF rules. > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Are those dependencies excluded from the source zip of the > > > Apache > > > >> > > Camel > > > >> > > >> > release? > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > > >> > Toshiya > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:35 PM Andrea Cosentino < > > > [email protected] > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> Hello Toshiya, > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> If the dependency is used just for testing and it's not > part > > > of the > > > >> > > >> >> release, there are no impediments in using it. > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> We were doing something similar in Apache Camel too for > some > > > >> > > >> dependencies > > > >> > > >> >> with license non-compliant with ASF rules. > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> Cheers. > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> Il giorno mer 11 dic 2024 alle ore 09:30 Toshiya > Kobayashi < > > > >> > > >> >> [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> Hello, > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> Currently we have GHA test failures with "pull access > > denied > > > for > > > >> > > >> >>> vectorized/redpanda" in kogito repos. > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> I filed a GH issue. > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1682 > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> Also I have filed a PR to replace > > > "vectorized/redpanda:v21.11.8" > > > >> > > with > > > >> > > >> >>> "redpandadata/redpanda:v24.3.1". > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3812 > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> and now I'm waiting for CI. > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> Here I want to raise a point. redpanda is under Business > > > Source > > > >> > > >> License > > > >> > > >> >>> 1.1. > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > https://github.com/redpanda-data/redpanda/blob/dev/licenses/bsl.md > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> , which is Category X ( > > > >> > > >> >>> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x). > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> A question to our mentors; Claus, Andrea and Brian: > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> redpanda is used for test infrastructure. Is it > considered > > as > > > >> > > >> >>> "dependency"? > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> If yes, using redpanda is considered as "Has Category X > > > >> > > dependencies" > > > >> > > >> in > > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469 ? > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> Regards, > > > >> > > >> >>> Toshiya > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
