Hi! Sorry, but the contents of these artifacts have already been in the released artifacts since we released the source.
We can add a session to the release procedure; that's no problem. Where do I update it? On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:41 AM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your reply, Ricardo. > > I understand that in those PRs all references are pointing to 10.0.0 > released artifacts, however it looks to me that the content of the PR > itself is a missing artifact of the release and the steps to submit > the PRs to those repositories should be added to the release procedure > document (and it's fine to have manual steps). > > I'd suggest that we incorporate these new artifact(s) - which is the > source that will create the PR for the operator repositories - for the > next release. > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 12:51 PM ricardo zanini fernandes > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi! Sorry, I missed this email. > > > > What we do is to use what we already have released to send a PR to those > repos. Nothing is created. For example, the last PRs I opened were for > 10.0.0. > > We used the artifacts published on our 10.0.0 tag. It's a manual step > since they won't accept bot accounts opening PRs there. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 7:36 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ricardo, or anyone knowledgeable about the topic, > >> > >> I’m seeking clarification regarding the origins of the source content > >> for the following PRs: > >> > >> - https://github.com/k8s-operatorhub/community-operators/pull/5428 > >> - > https://github.com/redhat-openshift-ecosystem/community-operators-prod/pull/5632 > >> > >> From my perspective, it seems that the content of these PRs should > >> have been included as part of the release as a dedicated artifact and > >> incorporated into the release procedure instructions for submitting > >> PRs to the appropriate external repositories. > >> > >> Could you please confirm if this understanding is correct or provide > >> further context on the expected process? > >> > >> Thank you in advance for your insights! > >> > >> - > >> Alex >
