This is the document we have for the release procedure

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t-08b970i9PMBy-TSM64x0RUH46pzwnIhEi-LVeL0lg/edit



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:51 AM ricardo zanini fernandes <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Sorry, but the contents of these artifacts have already been in the
> released artifacts since we released the source.
>
> We can add a session to the release procedure; that's no problem. Where do
> I update it?
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:41 AM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your reply, Ricardo.
> >
> > I understand that in those PRs all references are pointing to 10.0.0
> > released artifacts, however it looks to me that the content of the PR
> > itself is a missing artifact of the release and the steps to submit
> > the PRs to those repositories should be added to the release procedure
> > document (and it's fine to have manual steps).
> >
> > I'd suggest that we incorporate these new artifact(s) - which is the
> > source that will create the PR for the operator repositories - for the
> > next release.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 12:51 PM ricardo zanini fernandes
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi! Sorry, I missed this email.
> > >
> > > What we do is to use what we already have released to send a PR to
> those
> > repos. Nothing is created. For example, the last PRs I opened were for
> > 10.0.0.
> > > We used the artifacts published on our 10.0.0 tag. It's a manual step
> > since they won't accept bot accounts opening PRs there.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 7:36 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Ricardo, or anyone knowledgeable about the topic,
> > >>
> > >> I’m seeking clarification regarding the origins of the source content
> > >> for the following PRs:
> > >>
> > >> - https://github.com/k8s-operatorhub/community-operators/pull/5428
> > >> -
> >
> https://github.com/redhat-openshift-ecosystem/community-operators-prod/pull/5632
> > >>
> > >> From my perspective, it seems that the content of these PRs should
> > >> have been included as part of the release as a dedicated artifact and
> > >> incorporated into the release procedure instructions for submitting
> > >> PRs to the appropriate external repositories.
> > >>
> > >> Could you please confirm if this understanding is correct or provide
> > >> further context on the expected process?
> > >>
> > >> Thank you in advance for your insights!
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> Alex
> >
>

Reply via email to