Sounds good, Sumit! On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release > manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this should be > a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other bugs > at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs > updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll reply > to this thread. > > Sumit. > > > On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >All - > > > >I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs that we > >need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 that we > >were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up fixes. > > > >Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: > > > > > > 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 > > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> > > 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 > > Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> > > 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI > >don't > > render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> > > > > > >I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP form > >and > >will file those shortly. > >My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as tightly > >as possible. > > > >New features should target 0.10.0. > > > >I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a target > >release date of 6/10th. > > > >Thoughts? > > > >--larry > >
