All - As we are closing done on 11 or so days to our target release, I thought it would be good to provide a status.
We have addressed a few JIRAs that have been targeted for 0.9.1 and still have a handful to tackle. KNOX-711 has a patch available for review and I will be taking some time to review and test it. This is a fundamental change to how rewrite fuels are applied to services and therefore does require review in order to be committed. At the moment, we have the following open JIRAs: 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-714 Remove Permissive MIT License from NOTICE File <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-714> 4. [image: Bug] KNOX-715 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715>submitJava should allow multiple argument via arg() <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715> I am in the process of reviewing and testing KNOX-715 and hope to commit it today or early this week. KNOX-714 is a no brainer to just clean up the NOTICE file. Also at this point, we have the following list as the total bug fixes for 0.9.1: 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> 4. [image: Bug] KNOX-713 Knox Shell HDFS.get.Request is Package Private <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-713> 5. [image: Bug] KNOX-714 Remove Permissive MIT License from NOTICE File <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-714> 6. [image: Bug] KNOX-715 submitJava should allow multiple argument via arg() <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715> 7. [image: Bug] KNOX-716 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-716>Parameter setting for 'replayBufferSize' is no longer representing KBytes. <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-716> If there are any other issues that you feel need to be addressed please raise this as a discussion point so that we can plan accordingly. As we close down on this release, we should also start thinking about the 0.10.0 (perhaps a 1.0 candidate?) release and what would be required. thanks, --larry On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Minder <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on a bug fix 0.9.1 release targeted around June 10th. > I agree that it should be tightly scoped and the current candidate list > seems like a good starting point. > > +1 on Larry as the release manager for 0.9.1 also. > > > On May 12, 2016, at 3:38 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Let's see what Kevin has in mind... > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Sounds good, Sumit! > >> > >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta < > [email protected] > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the > release > >>> manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this > should be > >>> a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other > bugs > >>> at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs > >>> updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll > reply > >>> to this thread. > >>> > >>> Sumit. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> All - > >>>> > >>>> I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs > that > >>> we > >>>> need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 > that we > >>>> were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up fixes. > >>>> > >>>> Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 > >>>> submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> > >>>> 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 > >>>> Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> > >>>> 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI > >>>> don't > >>>> render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP > form > >>>> and > >>>> will file those shortly. > >>>> My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as > >>> tightly > >>>> as possible. > >>>> > >>>> New features should target 0.10.0. > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a > target > >>>> release date of 6/10th. > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > >>>> --larry > >>> > >>> > >> > >
