Let's see what Kevin has in mind... On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds good, Sumit! > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release >> manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this should be >> a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other bugs >> at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs >> updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll reply >> to this thread. >> >> Sumit. >> >> >> On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >All - >> > >> >I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs that >> we >> >need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 that we >> >were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up fixes. >> > >> >Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: >> > >> > >> > 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 >> > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> >> > 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 >> > Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> >> > 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI >> >don't >> > render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> >> > >> > >> >I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP form >> >and >> >will file those shortly. >> >My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as >> tightly >> >as possible. >> > >> >New features should target 0.10.0. >> > >> >I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a target >> >release date of 6/10th. >> > >> >Thoughts? >> > >> >--larry >> >> >
