Ran into an issue yesterday generating the correct checksums. I resolved
that last night and should have rc0 generated today.

Kevin Risden


On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:34 PM larry mccay <larry.mc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That makes sense.
> Thanks, Kevin!
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:29 PM
> Kevin Risden
> <kris...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All 1.2.0 issues have been resolved. Due to the Thanksgiving holiday
> > planning to look at rc0 on Monday.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KNOX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.2.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >
> > Kevin Risden
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:28 PM Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good. Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:25 AM
> > > Kevin Risden
> > > <kris...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is one jira left for 1.2.0 related to YARN rewrite rules. It is
> > > > currently being tested manually. Still hoping to get an RC built in
> the
> > > > next day or so.
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Risden
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 9:07 AM Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We are down to one unresolved 1.2.0 Jira [1] which now has
> subtasks.
> > > This
> > > > > consolidated the MR JHS/YARN rewrite work to one JIRA. Will look to
> > > > address
> > > > > the subtasks today.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KNOX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.2.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin Risden
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Awesome, Kevin. I've noticed the flurry of activity.
> > > > >> Thanks for taking this on!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 8:45 AM
> > > > >> Kevin Risden
> > > > >> <kris...@apache.org wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I created the 1.2.0 release branch last night. The master branch
> > has
> > > > >> been
> > > > >> > updated to 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT. Currently there are 9 unresolved
> JIRAs
> > > [1]
> > > > >> > tagged for 1.2.0 that I'll continue triaging. Some look to be
> > > > duplicates
> > > > >> > related to YARN so will try to figure out what should go into
> > 1.2.0
> > > or
> > > > >> > wait.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > 1.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KNOX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.2.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Kevin Risden
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM Kevin Risden <
> kris...@apache.org>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Timing sounds good. I can also comb through JIRA to see what
> we
> > > will
> > > > >> need
> > > > >> > > to move to 1.3.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Kevin Risden
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:39 AM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> Hi Kevin -
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Thank you for resurrecting this thread!
> > > > >> > >> I agree that we have had many upgrades and cleanup tasks as
> > well
> > > as
> > > > >> some
> > > > >> > >> meaningful enhancements.
> > > > >> > >> We should move on these as the 1.2.0 release as I don't
> believe
> > > > that
> > > > >> our
> > > > >> > >> KIP-11 based theme is going to provide much more in the next
> > few
> > > > >> weeks.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Also, thank you for volunteering to be the RM for 1.2.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> +1 to your proposal and volunteering to be RM!
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> I think if we are able to branch by Weds 11/7 that we should
> be
> > > > able
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> > >> have a RC by 11/14 or so and maybe have a successful by end
> of
> > > that
> > > > >> > week.
> > > > >> > >> I will start moving JIRAs out of 1.2.0 beginning this
> weekend.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> What are your thoughts on the above timing?
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> thanks,
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> --larry
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:03 AM
> > > > >> > >> Kevin Risden
> > > > >> > >> <kris...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> > There have been some great improvements to Apache Knox in
> the
> > > > past
> > > > >> 3
> > > > >> > >> months
> > > > >> > >> > since the 1.1.0 release on July 31. Many of these were
> > cleanups
> > > > to
> > > > >> > >> > dependencies and other build fixes. I am volunteering to be
> > the
> > > > >> > release
> > > > >> > >> > manager for 1.2.0. I can start the process next week
> > Wednesday
> > > > Nov
> > > > >> 7
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > >> get
> > > > >> > >> > in any remaining fixes for 1.2.0.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > Kevin Risden
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:30 PM larry mccay <
> > lmc...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > > All -
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > > It is time to start planning for 1.2.0 release.
> > > > >> > >> > > There is a large backlog of JIRAs that were pushed out of
> > > > >> previous
> > > > >> > >> > releases
> > > > >> > >> > > that we will need to triage before going any farther.
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > > There was also some discussion about a quick 1.2.0
> release
> > > > around
> > > > >> > >> cloud
> > > > >> > >> > > usecases. We will need to determine what usecases from
> > KIP-11
> > > > or
> > > > >> > >> others
> > > > >> > >> > to
> > > > >> > >> > > add.
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > > I make a pass through the 1.2.0 backlog and move things
> out
> > > and
> > > > >> > narrow
> > > > >> > >> > the
> > > > >> > >> > > scope. Please feel free to ask for things to be moved
> back
> > > in,
> > > > as
> > > > >> > >> > > appropriate.
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > > thanks,
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > > --larry
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to