I would say that the renaming to be more generic can wait until the next
release.
Especially, if we disable it out of the box for this release.


On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:26 AM Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org> wrote:

> Should we take care of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2344
> also/instead <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2344also/instead>
> ?
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:05 AM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Folks -
> >
> > Should we take this opportunity to address any of the issues we decided
> > were not blockers?
> > For instance, should we disable the CM monitor out of the box?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > --larry
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:42 AM Sandor Molnar
> > <smol...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I committed PR #318 (where the target is the master branch) 30 minutes
> > ago.
> > > I've just created another one for branch v1.4.0 here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/319
> > > Once all checks are completed I'm going to merge it too and you can
> spin
> > > RC3.
> > >
> > > Sandor
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:27 PM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Agreed.
> > > > I will cancel the VOTE on RC2 now and will wait for the PR to be
> > > committed
> > > > to spin RC 3.
> > > >
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I agree that this is a serious defect. Serious enough to merit
> > another
> > > > RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:53 AM Sandor Molnar
> > > > <smol...@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yesterday I found a bug in CM configuration monitor that is quite
> > > easy
> > > > to
> > > > > > reproduce and makes the entire feature broken. A JIRA was filed
> and
> > > the
> > > > > PR
> > > > > > is under review now:
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2350
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/318
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since CM related changes are a significant part of this release
> I'm
> > > > > > wondering if we should call out Knox 1.4.0 - RC3 with that fix
> > > > included.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any objections?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Sandor
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:14 PM Sandeep Moré <
> > moresand...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Found couple of issues in knoxcli while testing this release.
> > > > > > > Both of these bugs, KNOX-2315
> > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2315> and
> KNOX-2349
> > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2349> are not a
> > > > regression
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > > we can move ahead with the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Checked:
> > > > > > > * Downloaded and built from source
> > > > > > > * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
> > > > > > > * Verified GPG/SHA signatures for Knox source, Knox and
> Knoxshell
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > packages
> > > > > > > * Installed pseudo-distributed instance (Mac OS X )
> > > > > > > * Checked Zeppelin
> > > > > > > * Checked CM Service Discovery with kerberos auth
> > > > > > > * Checked remote alias service with kerberos auth (encountered
> > > > > KNOX-2315
> > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2315>)
> > > > > > > * Checked knoxcli command to convert topologies to providers
> and
> > > > > > > descriptors (encountered KNOX-2349
> > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2349>)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Sandeep
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 4:27 PM larry mccay <
> > larry.mc...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > All -
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A 2nd candidate for the Apache Knox 1.4.0 release is
> available
> > > at:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-1.4.0/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
> > > > > > > > Branch v1.4.0 (git checkout -b v1.4.0)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The KEYS file for signature validation is available at:
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To assist in testing the knoxshell features you can find the
> > new
> > > > > > > KnoxShell
> > > > > > > > User Guide at
> > > > > > > >
> > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-1-4-0/knoxshell_user_guide.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gateway User Guide:
> > > > > > > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-1-4-0/user-guide.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dev Guide:
> > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-1-4-0/dev-guide.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 1.4.0.
> > > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> majority
> > > of
> > > > at
> > > > > > > > least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 1.4.0
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --larry
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to