Hi Larry,

I managed to have both JIRAs fixed on the v1.4.0 branch. See Git's log
since RC2:

commit 48b6e84f7edbfdd5838a4e28762bd5f8471534ae (*HEAD -> **v1.4.0*,
*upstream/v1.4.0*)

Author: Sandor Molnar <smol...@apache.org>

Date:   Wed Apr 22 13:35:00 2020 +0200


    KNOX-2350 - Handling event types w/o COMMAND and/or COMMAND_STATUS
attributes when polling CM events (#318) (#319)


commit 60bb44d1bacebca6e362f58c5e754e66b5586a3e

Author: Sandor Molnar <smol...@apache.org>

Date:   Wed Apr 22 10:59:28 2020 +0200


    KNOX-2353 - Disabled CM descriptor monitoring and advanced service
discovery changes monitoring by default (#320)


commit 9634a3ed4ab06f2aaf7bb2acbc2ea721717efbc4

Author: Kevin Risden <risd...@users.noreply.github.com>

Date:   Mon Apr 20 12:29:04 2020 -0400


    KNOX-2347 - Disable shellcheck for github actions (#317)



    Signed-off-by: Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org>


commit 2069f9511d8ac2d3d5572db3ee24a46a436829f3 (*tag: v1.4.0-rc2*)

Author: lmccay <lmc...@apache.org>

Date:   Sun Apr 19 13:46:08 2020 -0400


    KNOX-2345 - KnoxShellTable must handle NULL cols

I think it should be OK to spin RC3 based on this state.

Cheers,
Sandor

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 8:44 PM Sandor Molnar <smol...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> I've just filed a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2353
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:47 PM Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:43 AM larry mccay <larry.mc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I would say that the renaming to be more generic can wait until the next
>> > release.
>> > Especially, if we disable it out of the box for this release.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:26 AM Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Should we take care of
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2344
>> > > also/instead <
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2344also/instead>
>> > > ?
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:05 AM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Folks -
>> > > >
>> > > > Should we take this opportunity to address any of the issues we
>> decided
>> > > > were not blockers?
>> > > > For instance, should we disable the CM monitor out of the box?
>> > > >
>> > > > thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > --larry
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:42 AM Sandor Molnar
>> > > > <smol...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I committed PR #318 (where the target is the master branch) 30
>> > minutes
>> > > > ago.
>> > > > > I've just created another one for branch v1.4.0 here:
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/319
>> > > > > Once all checks are completed I'm going to merge it too and you
>> can
>> > > spin
>> > > > > RC3.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sandor
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:27 PM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Agreed.
>> > > > > > I will cancel the VOTE on RC2 now and will wait for the PR to be
>> > > > > committed
>> > > > > > to spin RC 3.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Phil Zampino <
>> pzamp...@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I agree that this is a serious defect. Serious enough to merit
>> > > > another
>> > > > > > RC.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:53 AM Sandor Molnar
>> > > > > > <smol...@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi folks,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > yesterday I found a bug in CM configuration monitor that is
>> > quite
>> > > > > easy
>> > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > reproduce and makes the entire feature broken. A JIRA was
>> filed
>> > > and
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > PR
>> > > > > > > > is under review now:
>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2350
>> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/318
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Since CM related changes are a significant part of this
>> release
>> > > I'm
>> > > > > > > > wondering if we should call out Knox 1.4.0 - RC3 with that
>> fix
>> > > > > > included.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Any objections?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > Sandor
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:14 PM Sandeep Moré <
>> > > > moresand...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Found couple of issues in knoxcli while testing this
>> release.
>> > > > > > > > > Both of these bugs, KNOX-2315
>> > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2315> and
>> > > KNOX-2349
>> > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2349> are
>> not a
>> > > > > > regression
>> > > > > > > > so
>> > > > > > > > > we can move ahead with the release.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Checked:
>> > > > > > > > > * Downloaded and built from source
>> > > > > > > > > * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
>> > > > > > > > > * Verified GPG/SHA signatures for Knox source, Knox and
>> > > Knoxshell
>> > > > > > > release
>> > > > > > > > > packages
>> > > > > > > > > * Installed pseudo-distributed instance (Mac OS X )
>> > > > > > > > > * Checked Zeppelin
>> > > > > > > > > * Checked CM Service Discovery with kerberos auth
>> > > > > > > > > * Checked remote alias service with kerberos auth
>> > (encountered
>> > > > > > > KNOX-2315
>> > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2315>)
>> > > > > > > > > * Checked knoxcli command to convert topologies to
>> providers
>> > > and
>> > > > > > > > > descriptors (encountered KNOX-2349
>> > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2349>)
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > > Sandeep
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 4:27 PM larry mccay <
>> > > > larry.mc...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > All -
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > A 2nd candidate for the Apache Knox 1.4.0 release is
>> > > available
>> > > > > at:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-1.4.0/
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources
>> in:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > https://https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
>> > > > > > > > > > Branch v1.4.0 (git checkout -b v1.4.0)
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > The KEYS file for signature validation is available at:
>> > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > To assist in testing the knoxshell features you can find
>> > the
>> > > > new
>> > > > > > > > > KnoxShell
>> > > > > > > > > > User Guide at
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-1-4-0/knoxshell_user_guide.html
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Gateway User Guide:
>> > > > > > > > > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-1-4-0/user-guide.html
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Dev Guide:
>> > > > > http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-1-4-0/dev-guide.html
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox
>> 1.4.0.
>> > > > > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
>> > > majority
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > at
>> > > > > > > > > > least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 1.4.0
>> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > --larry
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to