The release doc is a bit of a mess and mostly just a place holder but is
linked of the site.
https://cwiki.apache.org/KNOX/release-process.html
On 3/28/13 6:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
+100!
Makes sense to me, Kevin.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:01 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Chris,
I have a release process doc started based on a few examples I've
found. I found however that trying to document without actually having
done it once very difficult. This is one of the reasons I'm
recommending a release so that I can do it and document what was required.
Kevin.
On 3/28/13 4:46 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
+1 from me and yes, a [DISCUSS] would have been fine.
Mainly to indicate that you are discussing it, but not to block you
from doing it. However, in the meanwhile, one thing you may want to
focus on Kevin is creating a ReleaseProcess doc like this one:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
And putting on the wiki to let folks know what steps you are executing.
Yes I know this is documented in general (in various places). However,
having
a project specific release doc, with simply the steps is great too.
Cheers!
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Devaraj Das <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:36 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
<[email protected]>wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
wanting a release at this time are:
1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
try
it.
2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
[ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
Kevin.
