OK. I see. The [DISCUSS] is enough to create the RC and the [VOTE] is
for approval of the RC. I assumed we were voting to ensure that
everyone agreed we should even create an RC. So I'll get busy and
create the RC and then call for a vote.
What is the proper way to terminate this thread. I'm assuming it will
take me a few days to properly create the RC.
On 3/29/13 12:04 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
Hey Kevin, you basically need two steps. One a DISCUSS thread where
you propose making a release, and (assuming folks agree) another a
VOTE thread on a staged RC candidate. People (PPMC & IPMC) should try
out the release and do the various RC checks, and then vote. If the
vote passes make the release official..
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Kevin Minder <[email protected]> wrote:
I still don't understand. I thought I...
1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday.
2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative.
3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday
4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for
vote results.
5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and
staging the first RC.
Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not created a
RC yet because the vote hasn't passed.
Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them.
On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Kevin,
Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
My bad, should have been specific.
Thanks for all of your effort!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
<[email protected]>wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
wanting a release at this time are:
1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
try
it.
2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
[ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
Kevin.
