Hey Kevin,
-----Original Message----- From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, March 29, 2013 8:48 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release >I still don't understand. I thought I... > > 1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday. > 2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative. > 3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday > 4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for > vote results. > 5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and > staging the first RC. > >Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not >created a RC yet because the vote hasn't passed. >Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them. Don't worry they aren't blunders. Basically the idea is: 1. [DISCUSS], no objections; then 2. Do RC work (you need the URLs and staging repos/etc. before sending [VOTE] RC email); then 3. [VOTE] release candidate on dev@knox 4. If all good in #3, then: A. if you got 3 +1 IPMC votes in #4, you simply forward the result to general@incubator B. If you didn't get 3 +1 IPMC votes in #4, you ask for more VOTEs on the general@incubator email That's it. You're doing great. Cheers, Chris > > >On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >> Hey Kevin, >> >> Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate, >> and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the >> VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC. >> >> My bad, should have been specific. >> >> Thanks for all of your effort! >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: [email protected] >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" >><[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release >> >>> I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and >>> calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing? >>> >>> On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: >>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons >>>>>for >>>>> wanting a release at this time are: >>>>> >>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we >>>>> try >>>>> it. >>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible. >>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox. >>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors. >>>>> >>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release >>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care. >>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because... >>>>> >>>>> Kevin. >>>>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
