Marcus Lange wrote:
I would propose to merge the two pages you created with main
http://download.openoffice.org/other.html and
http://download.openoffice.org/langpack.html respectively.
I've tried this but don't liked it because IMHO this is too much content
for a single page.
Untested builds could be listed in the same table as tested builds, or
in a new one. In case of former, the resulting download table could look
something like this:
OK, with the hint of "Untested" it could work. I've to play with this
setup.
I tried to start with this but I still think we should not mix stable
and unstable builds together:
- builds for the platforms Itanium and Linux PPC (not done by Sun) have
just an en-US, all other languages would remain empty in the column.
- even so all builds for Mac OS PPC (which are done by Maho) have to be
integrsted, currently there is no process for this and doing it
hand-by-hand is a mess
- what do we do with stable releases that are older than the current RC?
E.g.:
Mac OS X PPC for en-US: 2.4.0 is the latest stable release and 3.1.1
RC2 is the most recent one. Both cannot be listed in a mixed table.
So, I still think separated tables and websites are the best to guide
the users to the appropriate files. Then it's just a question of how to
make them available and visible in the best way.
Best regards
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l10n.openoffice.org
