Richard Frovarp schrieb: > Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] >>> Why does it look for publication.xconf and not publication.xml? >> >> because we haven't renamed that one yet? >> i thought about doing it last week, but then i decided against it, >> because it would have been really confusing for our beta testers: >> >> "ok, you need to merge the contents of publication.xml into >> config/publication.xconf, which has a different format now and was >> renamed to config/publication.xml..." :-D >> >> since it's not a functional change but a plain search+replace, we >> could do it for RC2... >> > -1 Yeah, but it is a change on how things work. Testers/users will have > to go through and make more changes to their publication so that it will > be compatible with RC2. Having to change publication files for RC1 was > fine (actually I'm doing it tomorrow). I don't agree with having to > change files for RC2. What if we do this automatically in the build process? -- Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
