I also discussed this matter with experts of Urdu and they say it would only work with hunspell not aspell or ispell. It is true Urdu characters are not in ISO8851. But we are hoping to do something about this in future currently this language should be in OOo. Suffix rules are not yet completely generated for mother languages of Urdu i.e. Persian and Arabic probably so it is out of question at present for Urdu. Anyhow a nice discussion and i hope now it would be ok for spellchecker ;). I'll wait for "ALL DONE" signal. thanx a lot for helping me. Regards Muhammad Shakir Aziz
On 1/12/07, True Friend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hmmmmmmmm anyhows i think first it should be added in OOo. then we do something about other applications also like FF and Thunder Bird etc. On 1/12/07, Erdal Ronahi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/11/07, True Friend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Urdu is encoded in UTF8. Urdu mean urdu not hindi. and 8 indicates > that it > > is in 8 bit. > > Regards > > Muhammad Shakir > > Friedel probably meant whether it can be encoded with a 256-char > (8bit) codepage like ISO 5589-6 (Arabic). Probably that is not the > case: > > http://czyborra.com/charsets/iso8859.html#ISO-8859-6 > > UTF-8 does not mean that everything can be expressed using 8 bits. > > Erdal > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- محمد شاکر عزیز
-- محمد شاکر عزیز
