Laurent Godard wrote: > Hi Mathias > >>> There is no structure to handle SpellChecker updates and i do it when time >> >> So I wonder how good this works for all the possible patches we might >> get or already got. Laurent, do you think that this feasible? >> >> Who feels responsible for issues assigned to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? >> >> Can we (means: all people interested in the linguistic project) do >> something to improve the current situation? > > The problem is that I could (if time) take care of french entries (btw, > there is some work actually being done at the french level on the aff > file) but not of the other > > The main problem is : to be responsible of a patch, you should > understand it. And a linguistic patch on a dictionnay of a foreign > language is something you can not control. > > So I would say that nativ-lang leaders (by default) would be responsible > of validating the changes of .aff and .dic files. Then at the > linguistic, we could take car of them as black boxes
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. So perhaps we should bring this up the NL dev list. The responsibility of the linguistic project then only would be to pass patches along. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
