Le Mar 2 octobre 2007 18:08, Mathias Bauer a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >> Le Mar 2 octobre 2007 09:23, Mathias Bauer a écrit : >> >>> Sorry for being unclear, I wanted to say something else: if we >>> allowed >>> to build and use native packages from the dictionaries contributed >>> to >>> OOo easily - would that be what is needed? >> >> I'm afraid I'm failing to parse there :) > > Hm, I know that my sentences tend to become too long at times. Sorry > ;-) > > I thought that if distributors want to create their own packages > anyway > it might be enough to just give them access to the dictionaries in the > OOo repository and make OOo aware of other folders to look for them > once > installed. No building necessary, no packaging from OOo's side.
That's completely true on the 'no building or packaging' side. On the 'just give access' side, distributors prefer regular versioned archive dumps on an ftp/http: - when you pull stuff directly from an SCM/source repository you always have the risk to pull at the wrong time, - the main native package formats (rpm and deb) are designed to allow auditing, and the audit trail breaks if you a poorly defined scm dump in the package -- Nicolas Mailhot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
