On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:01:31 -0700, chris# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:02:25 -0400, till <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Anyway, my vote stands - remove code we don't need. > It's your vote, and you have every right. :) >> If distros wanna >> drag DB along it's probably because of dependencies in other software. > Could it not also be that keeping it lends itself to greater flexibility, > which, in turn > lends itself to easier "adoptability", or ease of use? Point being; if > having it > means that more people are likely to meet the _prerequisites_, then ppl > will > be more likely to adopt it. No? Also, really, how much overhead does > keeping > it really impose?
I'm astonished. The PEAR::DB developers are telling you to change DB -> MDB2, so why do you think it's a good idea to use DB? I've used MDB2 for quite some time, and I think is more robust, and will get more features in the near future, something that DB will not. _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
