On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:26 AM, chris# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh. I quite agree that MDB2 is more robust - no doubt about it. I would also > assert that many are of the philosophy that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". > Which will greatly account for those that are still using DB. There is still a > possible issue with MDB2 regarding file reads (attachments). While this > may be a "border case". Until the source of the issue has been _conclusively_ > determined (which may in fact turn out to be an MDB2 version) DB should > (must?) > remain. No?
Chris, I still don't understand which issue it is, so can you please point out if an issue has been reported, or not? If it has not been reported, please open a ticket and include steps to reproduce it (e.g. sample email) so we can fix it right away? Thanks, Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
