On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:26:16 -0700, chris# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh. I quite agree that MDB2 is more robust - no doubt about it. I would > also assert that many are of the philosophy that "if it ain't broke, > don't fix it". Which will greatly account for those that are still > using DB. There is still a possible issue with MDB2 regarding file reads > (attachments). While this may be a "border case". Until the source of > the issue has been _conclusively_ determined (which may in fact turn out > to be an MDB2 version) DB should (must?) remain. No? I just noticed that ALEC checked in a change that removed DB yesterday. Did Chris' concerns above get addressed, or is there still a chance that there's a problem with attachments and MDB2? _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
