On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:42PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> On 01/21/2014 12:22 PM, Yang Chengwei wrote:
> 
>     On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:38:32AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
>         On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:26:57 +0100 José Bollo 
> <[email protected]>
>         said:
> 
> 
>             On mar, 2014-01-14 at 20:45 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
>                 On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:19:43 +0200 Jussi Laako 
> <[email protected]>
>                 said:
> 
> 
>                     On 14.1.2014 4:16, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
>                         having a "enable ssh" option on devices (when you 
> enable developer mode)
>                         would be the best of both options. it's not on by 
> default, but it's a
>                         simple click away.
> 
>                     Just "Enable developer mode" in device settings would be 
> fine. But I
>                     wouldn't like to have a car that has ssh wide open to the 
> world with
>                     some default password or key... Nor phone either.
> 
>                 i'm fine with that. a single simple checkbox is fine for me 
> :) and agree -
>                 if enabled as a service, it should require you enter a 
> password at that
>                 tome - no default passwords/accounts. perhaps limit sshd to 
> only listen on
>                 usbnet and any wifi etc. networks you tags as "trusted". :)
> 
> 
>             The check box should have a time limited effect. That means that 
> you can
>             forget to uncheck it, it will uncheck itself after a while.
> 
>             The check box should also be associated to a kind of password. It 
> is not
>             acceptable that a developer tool can connect to any device just 
> because
>             to check box is checked. I'm not saying that a password must be 
> set but
>             that a password can be set if wanted.
> 
>         i would say a password SHOULD be set at that time - no defaults. and 
> that
>         password retained so you don't need to keep re-setting it each time 
> (but able
>         to be changed too from that menu). if there is a timeout, i would say 
> it should
>         be a timeout between successful logins on sshd. if there has not been 
> a
>         successful login in let's say 7 days, turn it off. (that would mean 
> developers
>         using it all the time at least once per week don't get bothered). or 
> hey - make
>         the timeout configurable... :) let the developer decide how 
> bothersome they are
>         willing to accept things vs security.
> 
>     I'm not sure it's worth a discussion or not about ship Tizen with ssh
>     service, for me, sdb is useful enough for developers, and it's more
>     security, at least one need connect a usb cable to the device, if one
>     can archive your device, then it's done.
> 
> 
> ssh offers far more:
> 
> * authorized access by passoword and/or ssh key (so if someone gets hold of
> your device and plugs it in they can't do anything without auth).

I think this is not a common using scenario for a *mobile* device, why
it works like server? Why you don't bring it around you?

In the last word, you can setup a sdb over ssh tunnel if you like.

> * sshfs. need i say more. much more useful than sdb. :)

I don't know how common sshfs be used in your daily work, but not for
me, I only used it for my tomboy notes sync-up.

For developers (I think mostly app developers), sdb is good enough,
anyone want more, I think he'll manage to root or reflash the device,
then it's a developer-version device.

--
Thanks,
Chengwei

> 
> 
> 
> 
>     --
>     Thanks,
>     Chengwei
> 
> 
>         --
>         Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Dev mailing list
>         [email protected]
>         https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
> 
> 
>        
>         _______________________________________________
>         Dev mailing list
>         [email protected]
>         https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
> 
> 
> --
> The above message is intended solely for the named addressee and may
> contain trade secret, industrial technology or privileged and
> confidential information otherwise protected under applicable law
> including the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection
> Act. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the
> information contained in this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> by email and delete this communication immediately.
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to