On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:20 +0100, Kévin THIERRY wrote: > Patrick, I agree with your proposition, it is clearly a better and > cleaner way to create and maintain tizen-distro. > Also thanks a lot for explaining how it works :)
Before we make the proposed sandbox branches official, we should also consider another question: which arm boards to we want to support with Tizen on Yocto? If it turns out that we need meta-yocto-bsp for one of those, then stripping out that layer from the proposed tizen-distro was too aggressive and should be undone. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
