Log4j and Log4net don't share any code, just similar architectures. As for why we haven't merged that into log4net, that may because it either was never noticed or the authors never attempted to donate it upstream in the first place.
On 7 May 2018 at 12:22, William Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok then, so are the same Async Appenders available in Log4Net that are in > Log4j ? > Here are some one I'm using: > https://github.com/cjbhaines/Log4Net.Async > (my .net standard port: https://github.com/wjdavis5/Log4Net.Async) > Also been looking into an Async Buffering Appender. Just seems we could get > so much more value out of the core product if these were rolled in. (And I > wouldnt have to struggle to get .net core support from ill maintained > repos.) > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Oh, no worries, you're on the correct list! > > > > On 7 May 2018 at 09:02, William Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Sorry I meant to send this to the Log4Net distro > > > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Like the Kafka appender's async option? Or like the async logger and > > > > appenders? > > > > > > > > On 7 May 2018 at 07:38, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Log4j core provides about 4 flavours of async logging, several of > > which > > > > > use non-blocking data structures. > > > > > > > > > > Can you link to the ones you think should be included? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Remko > > > > > > > > > > (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves > > http://picocli.info > > > > > > > > > > > On May 7, 2018, at 14:15, William Davis < > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed that there are several Async implementations of > > standard > > > > > > appenders out in the wild. Is there a reason none of these have > > made > > > > > there > > > > > > way into the core product? Is it just b/c no one has taken the > time > > > to > > > > > do a > > > > > > pull request, or is there some other reason? > > > > > > > > > > > > I've had several projects where we need the non-blocking nature > of > > > > these > > > > > > appenders to achieve desired performance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
