Please feel free! Our bandwidth for log4net is a bit less since there are less developers here familiar with C#, but we love contributions. :)
On 7 May 2018 at 17:52, William Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > I gotcha, if there is interest Id like to get a pr started. > > On Mon, May 7, 2018, 1:25 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Log4j and Log4net don't share any code, just similar architectures. As > for > > why we haven't merged that into log4net, that may because it either was > > never noticed or the authors never attempted to donate it upstream in the > > first place. > > > > On 7 May 2018 at 12:22, William Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Ok then, so are the same Async Appenders available in Log4Net that are > in > > > Log4j ? > > > Here are some one I'm using: > > > https://github.com/cjbhaines/Log4Net.Async > > > (my .net standard port: https://github.com/wjdavis5/Log4Net.Async) > > > Also been looking into an Async Buffering Appender. Just seems we could > > get > > > so much more value out of the core product if these were rolled in. > (And > > I > > > wouldnt have to struggle to get .net core support from ill maintained > > > repos.) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Oh, no worries, you're on the correct list! > > > > > > > > On 7 May 2018 at 09:02, William Davis <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry I meant to send this to the Log4Net distro > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Like the Kafka appender's async option? Or like the async logger > > and > > > > > > appenders? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 May 2018 at 07:38, Remko Popma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Log4j core provides about 4 flavours of async logging, several > of > > > > which > > > > > > > use non-blocking data structures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you link to the ones you think should be included? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remko > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves > > > > http://picocli.info > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 7, 2018, at 14:15, William Davis < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed that there are several Async implementations of > > > > standard > > > > > > > > appenders out in the wild. Is there a reason none of these > have > > > > made > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > way into the core product? Is it just b/c no one has taken > the > > > time > > > > > to > > > > > > > do a > > > > > > > > pull request, or is there some other reason? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've had several projects where we need the non-blocking > nature > > > of > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > appenders to achieve desired performance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
