As apache folks, we have the benefit of sponsored msdn subscriptions and
thus some sponsored computing time in azure. May that be an option?

I dont know about the tasks involved.

I can also think of cross compiling on ubuntu inside docker by leveraging
dotnet-sdk and linking against the reference assemblies shipped with mono
or other requirements that can be provided with Dockerfile's, github
actions or other build infrastructure. This [1] is a reference project that
works and may serve as a minimalistic sample that, to be honest, is pure
net core/netstandard and therefore lacks mono.

[1] https://github.com/dpsenner/event-sorcery
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
them.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 16:48 Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Looks like AppVeyor is another option. Is that comparable to CircleCI?
>
> (For context, I'm mostly familiar with Jenkins as I work on that
> project at $dayjob)
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 09:36, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Seems like I missed some other services:
> https://infra.apache.org/services.html
> >
> > If nothing on there is appropriate, I think we need to create a Jira
> > ticket in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 01:28, Davyd McColl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > What would need to be done to make other CI systems talk with Apache
> Infra?
> > >
> > > I ask because I've spend around a day now trying to convince Travis CI
> to build log4net successfully, without a lot of joy, particularly because
> the Travis Windows build environment is quite out of date, having been
> launched as a beta service in 2018, with tooling from 2015. I can get
> vs2019 installed via chocolatey packages, which solves most of the
> requirements, but haven't had joy in getting .net 3.5 to install on the
> build machine yet, resulting in predictable build failures. In addition,
> the installation of vs2019 tooling adds a few minutes to build.
> > >
> > > In contrast, build at CircleCI has been simple, quick, and, best of
> all, works. I've also figured out artifact publishing, so, with the
> addition of some scripting, one possible solution might be for an Apache
> Jenkins build job to simply download the nuget package from CircleCI and
> publish it -- meaning that Apache nuget keys don't have to leave secure
> premises, which is a good thing (: For example, a parameterised build which
> is given only a build number could be manually kicked off when a release
> has been approved by all involved. This build could download the .nupkg
> from CircleCI and publish to nuget.org.
> > >
> > > If this (or something similar) seems like a viable option, I may be in
> a position to raise a PR (after cleaning up some git history -- I probably
> have 50 or 100 commits which are only attempts at getting TravisCI to build
> with varying approaches.
> > >
> > > -d
> > > On 2020-04-25 22:15:36, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The only external build systems that are set up for Apache right now
> > > are Travis and some limited GitHub Action experiments. Other CI
> > > systems may need to talk with Apache Infra.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 14:47, Davyd McColl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the reply (:
> > > >
> > > > Would external build systems like circleci be acceptable too?
> > > >
> > > > -d
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On April 25, 2020 21:03:01 Matt Sicker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Info about our existing infra is documented here:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 13:38, Davyd McColl wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Quick question: what operating system does the available CI
> server run?
> > > > >> Even if docker is an option, the host system is matters.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks
> > > > >> -d
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matt Sicker
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matt Sicker
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>

Reply via email to