I figured out that the document is now at home.apache.org 
<http://home.apache.org/>. Unfortunately, that didn’t do me any good. gpg -d is 
failing with “No secret key”. That doesn’t seem too surprising since my key 
wasn’t used to sign the document.

Ralph

> On Aug 21, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> Dominik,
> 
> The README file says that the keys can be found at 
> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc 
> <https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc>.  That url returns a 
> 404. Any idea where it moved to?
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Aug 17, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I guess that would be a nuget publish.
>> 
>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/publish-a-package
>> 
>> The credentials to that account are stored in the private repos of logging
>> pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients with their
>> gpg key.
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
>> them.
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 08:56 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Great!
>>> 
>>> How do we get the nupkg to nuget.org? This is the final step that most
>>> users are going to be interested in.
>>> 
>>> Having a look at what's at the url you posted, I have ideas on how to
>>> streamline future releases, so the next time I'm in that area, I'm
>>> definitely implementing those ideas. I don't see changes to the Release
>>> Notes area -- if I were to try to streamline that into a release, would a
>>> CHANGELOG file be useful? Or is there a better way?
>>> 
>>> -d
>>> On 2020/08/16 23:26:07, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I committed them to dist already. I don't know how long we should wait
>>> for any mirroring to catch up, though on my end, I see updated
>>> artifacts on https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/ other than
>>> the release notes.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:09, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1 to that!
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know when these are published. I can update the web site to
>>> reflect that it is no longer dormant.
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 16, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks so much for your help in releasing this!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Davyd McColl wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll make changes to the automated build to affect all changes you
>>> have
>>>>>> made (and perhaps will make) automatically to future releases for the
>>> next
>>>>>> release. Apologies for making this more difficult than it needs to be
>>> (:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -d
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On August 16, 2020 20:37:01 Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just a simple copy of the LICENSE and NOTICE file into the binaries
>>>>>>> zip, and a rename of the files to include "apache" in the name. I've
>>>>>>> uploaded them to dist along with updating the KEYS file for log4net,
>>>>>>> though that should probably be merged together with the project-wide
>>>>>>> KEYS file in the parent directory. There's an outdated README.html in
>>>>>>> the directory still containing the old release notes, but we can
>>>>>>> address that next.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:12, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> One issue I found in one of the artifacts that I can address before
>>>>>>>> uploading since it wasn't signed is the binaries zip is missing the
>>>>>>>> LICENSE file. I'm not sure if there's a standard way to include that
>>>>>>>> in the nupkg file, but I did see that in its metadata, it explicitly
>>>>>>>> says the code is Apache2 licensed at least.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:03, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'll sign and publish the artifacts today.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:43, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Remko. That makes 3 +1 votes from PMC members.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 2:12 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 Remko.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:04 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me. We can handle the release signing afterwards as
>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>> suggests.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:30, Ralph Goers
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can other PMC members please review this? It has been more
>>> than 72
>>>>>>>>>>>> hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Davyd McColl
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I've never done this before, so bear with me if I
>>> fluff it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposed vote to release log4net 2.0.9 from PR
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/61
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts (including source zip) are at:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/builds/34063235/artifacts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source can be checked out from
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/logging-log4net,
>>> tag rel/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.9. I can't push tags to the upstream, but this tag is
>>> exactly the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same commit as the last in the PR mentioned above, which was
>>>>>>>> accepted into
>>>>>>>>>>>> master a few days ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please check out the artifacts & if everyone is ok with
>>> what's there,
>>>>>>>>>>>> please can someone with the rights to publish to nuget do so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I've seen how this process works, I'd like to tackle the
>>> CVE that
>>>>>>>>>>>> has been brought up on this list more than once -- it's a
>>> simple change
>>>>>>>>>>>> which was already committed to the develop branch some time
>>> ago, so
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> are a couple of options here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. cherry-pick that commit & do a 2.0.10 release pronto, with
>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>> that change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. trawl the develop branch to see what else was already
>>> solved in
>>>>>>>>>>>> there, and get that out as 2.0.10, and perhaps close out that
>>> branch to
>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid future confusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -d
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to