There can’t be. That is what the release vote was for.

Ralph

> On Aug 23, 2020, at 1:02 AM, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Dominik
> 
> Are there any objections to me pushing the 2.0.9 package that had been 
> approved and uploaded to https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/ to 
> nuget.org?
> 
> -d
> 
> 
>> On August 23, 2020 09:59:02 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Davyd, I added you as a collaborator. This should grant you the privilege
>> to manage packages. You can now submit new and update or unlist existing
>> packages.
>> 
>> It would be great to have at least one other member of the pmc listed as
>> administrator. The following documents the matrix of permissions. Note that
>> the amount of administrative tasks should be very limited:
>> 
>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/organizations-on-nuget-org#managing-organization-members
>> 
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
>> them.
>> 
>>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 21:54 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Oh ok, well, mine is davydm (:
>>> 
>>> -d
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On August 22, 2020 20:49:59 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> > Apparently it cant be the email but must be the nuget accounts username,
>>> > apologies.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
>>> > them.
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 20:39 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I know I'm quite new, but I'm happy to push approved packages. My
>>> >> Microsoft
>>> >> account for nuget is this email address (dav...@gmail.com)
>>> >>
>>> >> -d
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On August 22, 2020 19:46:45 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I recall that we were forced to transform the nuget account
>>> >> Apache.Logging (
>>> >> > https://www.nuget.org/profiles/Apache.Logging) from a personal
>>> account
>>> >> into
>>> >> > an organization. I am currently the only member and administrator of
>>> that
>>> >> > organization. Please share with me (may also be in private) the nuget
>>> >> > account (most probably the email of your microsoft account) if you
>>> want
>>> >> me
>>> >> > to add you to the organization. Any member of the pmc may also become
>>> >> > administrator of that group if he wishes to.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > While I try to process your requests as fast as possible, please give
>>> me
>>> >> > some days. I am at the beach with the family and tend to swim and
>>> dive in
>>> >> > moments when I do not build sandcastles with the kids. ;-)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best regards
>>> >> > Dominik
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to
>>> find
>>> >> > them.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 02:01 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> And, FWIW, Nuget won’t let me register with my apache.org <
>>> >> >> http://apache.org/> email address saying it can’t be a work or
>>> school
>>> >> >> email.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Ralph
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Ralph Goers <
>>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > This gets better and better. I was able to decrypt the file but the
>>> >> >> credentials don’t work.  The Nuget.org <http://nuget.org/> site says
>>> >> >> “NuGet.org <http://nuget.org/> password login in no longer
>>> supported.
>>> >> >> Please use a Microsoft account to sign into NuGet gallery.”
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Ralph
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Ralph Goers <
>>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Going back through my old emails I see Dominik had the same
>>> problem
>>> >> in
>>> >> >> 2016. I forgot to update my files and now I see the instructions have
>>> >> >> changed.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Ralph Goers <
>>> >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> I figured out that the document is now at home.apache.org <
>>> >> >> http://home.apache.org/>. Unfortunately, that didn’t do me any good.
>>> >> gpg
>>> >> >> -d is failing with “No secret key”. That doesn’t seem too surprising
>>> >> since
>>> >> >> my key wasn’t used to sign the document.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Ralph Goers <
>>> >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>> Dominik,
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>> The README file says that the keys can be found at
>>> >> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc <
>>> >> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc>.  That url
>>> >> returns
>>> >> >> a 404. Any idea where it moved to?
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> On Aug 17, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Dominik Psenner <
>>> dpsen...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> I guess that would be a nuget publish.
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/publish-a-package
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> The credentials to that account are stored in the private
>>> repos of
>>> >> >> logging
>>> >> >> >>>>> pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients
>>> >> with
>>> >> >> their
>>> >> >> >>>>> gpg key.
>>> >> >> >>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who
>>> happens to
>>> >> >> find
>>> >> >> >>>>> them.
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 08:56 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> Great!
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> How do we get the nupkg to nuget.org? This is the final step
>>> >> that
>>> >> >> most
>>> >> >> >>>>>> users are going to be interested in.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> Having a look at what's at the url you posted, I have ideas on
>>> >> how
>>> >> >> to
>>> >> >> >>>>>> streamline future releases, so the next time I'm in that area,
>>> >> I'm
>>> >> >> >>>>>> definitely implementing those ideas. I don't see changes to
>>> the
>>> >> >> Release
>>> >> >> >>>>>> Notes area -- if I were to try to streamline that into a
>>> release,
>>> >> >> would a
>>> >> >> >>>>>> CHANGELOG file be useful? Or is there a better way?
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> -d
>>> >> >> >>>>>> On 2020/08/16 23:26:07, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>> I committed them to dist already. I don't know how long we
>>> should
>>> >> >> wait
>>> >> >> >>>>>> for any mirroring to catch up, though on my end, I see updated
>>> >> >> >>>>>> artifacts on https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/
>>> other
>>> >> >> than
>>> >> >> >>>>>> the release notes.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:09, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> +1 to that!
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Let me know when these are published. I can update the web
>>> site
>>> >> to
>>> >> >> >>>>>> reflect that it is no longer dormant.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your help in releasing this!
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Davyd McColl wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I'll make changes to the automated build to affect all
>>> changes
>>> >> >> you
>>> >> >> >>>>>> have
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> made (and perhaps will make) automatically to future
>>> releases
>>> >> >> for the
>>> >> >> >>>>>> next
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> release. Apologies for making this more difficult than it
>>> >> needs
>>> >> >> to be
>>> >> >> >>>>>> (:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -d
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On August 16, 2020 20:37:01 Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Just a simple copy of the LICENSE and NOTICE file into the
>>> >> >> binaries
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> zip, and a rename of the files to include "apache" in the
>>> >> name.
>>> >> >> I've
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> uploaded them to dist along with updating the KEYS file
>>> for
>>> >> >> log4net,
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> though that should probably be merged together with the
>>> >> >> project-wide
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> KEYS file in the parent directory. There's an outdated
>>> >> >> README.html in
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> the directory still containing the old release notes, but
>>> we
>>> >> can
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> address that next.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:12, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> One issue I found in one of the artifacts that I can
>>> address
>>> >> >> before
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> uploading since it wasn't signed is the binaries zip is
>>> >> >> missing the
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE file. I'm not sure if there's a standard way to
>>> >> >> include that
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> in the nupkg file, but I did see that in its metadata, it
>>> >> >> explicitly
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> says the code is Apache2 licensed at least.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:03, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll sign and publish the artifacts today.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:43, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Remko. That makes 3 +1 votes from PMC members.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 2:12 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 Remko.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:04 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me. We can handle the release signing
>>> >> afterwards as
>>> >> >> >>>>>> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> suggests.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:30, Ralph Goers
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can other PMC members please review this? It has
>>> been
>>> >> more
>>> >> >> >>>>>> than 72
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Davyd McColl
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I've never done this before, so bear with
>>> me
>>> >> if I
>>> >> >> >>>>>> fluff it:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposed vote to release log4net 2.0.9
>>> from
>>> >> PR
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/61
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts (including source zip) are at:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/builds/34063235/artifacts
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source can be checked out from
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> https://github.com/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/logging-log4net,
>>> >> >> >>>>>> tag rel/
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.9. I can't push tags to the upstream, but this
>>> tag
>>> >> is
>>> >> >> >>>>>> exactly the
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same commit as the last in the PR mentioned above,
>>> which
>>> >> >> was
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> accepted into
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master a few days ago.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please check out the artifacts & if everyone is ok
>>> >> with
>>> >> >> >>>>>> what's there,
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please can someone with the rights to publish to
>>> nuget
>>> >> do
>>> >> >> so.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I've seen how this process works, I'd like to
>>> >> >> tackle the
>>> >> >> >>>>>> CVE that
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been brought up on this list more than once --
>>> it's
>>> >> a
>>> >> >> >>>>>> simple change
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was already committed to the develop branch
>>> some
>>> >> time
>>> >> >> >>>>>> ago, so
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> there
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are a couple of options here:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. cherry-pick that commit & do a 2.0.10 release
>>> >> pronto,
>>> >> >> with
>>> >> >> >>>>>> only
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that change
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. trawl the develop branch to see what else was
>>> >> already
>>> >> >> >>>>>> solved in
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, and get that out as 2.0.10, and perhaps close
>>> out
>>> >> >> that
>>> >> >> >>>>>> branch to
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid future confusion.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your time
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -d
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> --
>>> >> >> >>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> 


Reply via email to