There can’t be. That is what the release vote was for. Ralph
> On Aug 23, 2020, at 1:02 AM, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Dominik > > Are there any objections to me pushing the 2.0.9 package that had been > approved and uploaded to https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/ to > nuget.org? > > -d > > >> On August 23, 2020 09:59:02 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Davyd, I added you as a collaborator. This should grant you the privilege >> to manage packages. You can now submit new and update or unlist existing >> packages. >> >> It would be great to have at least one other member of the pmc listed as >> administrator. The following documents the matrix of permissions. Note that >> the amount of administrative tasks should be very limited: >> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/organizations-on-nuget-org#managing-organization-members >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find >> them. >> >>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 21:54 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Oh ok, well, mine is davydm (: >>> >>> -d >>> >>> >>>> On August 22, 2020 20:49:59 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Apparently it cant be the email but must be the nuget accounts username, >>> > apologies. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find >>> > them. >>> > >>> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 20:39 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I know I'm quite new, but I'm happy to push approved packages. My >>> >> Microsoft >>> >> account for nuget is this email address (dav...@gmail.com) >>> >> >>> >> -d >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On August 22, 2020 19:46:45 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Hi >>> >> > >>> >> > I recall that we were forced to transform the nuget account >>> >> Apache.Logging ( >>> >> > https://www.nuget.org/profiles/Apache.Logging) from a personal >>> account >>> >> into >>> >> > an organization. I am currently the only member and administrator of >>> that >>> >> > organization. Please share with me (may also be in private) the nuget >>> >> > account (most probably the email of your microsoft account) if you >>> want >>> >> me >>> >> > to add you to the organization. Any member of the pmc may also become >>> >> > administrator of that group if he wishes to. >>> >> > >>> >> > While I try to process your requests as fast as possible, please give >>> me >>> >> > some days. I am at the beach with the family and tend to swim and >>> dive in >>> >> > moments when I do not build sandcastles with the kids. ;-) >>> >> > >>> >> > Best regards >>> >> > Dominik >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to >>> find >>> >> > them. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 02:01 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> And, FWIW, Nuget won’t let me register with my apache.org < >>> >> >> http://apache.org/> email address saying it can’t be a work or >>> school >>> >> >> email. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Ralph >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Ralph Goers < >>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > This gets better and better. I was able to decrypt the file but the >>> >> >> credentials don’t work. The Nuget.org <http://nuget.org/> site says >>> >> >> “NuGet.org <http://nuget.org/> password login in no longer >>> supported. >>> >> >> Please use a Microsoft account to sign into NuGet gallery.” >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Ralph >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Ralph Goers < >>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >>> >> > >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Going back through my old emails I see Dominik had the same >>> problem >>> >> in >>> >> >> 2016. I forgot to update my files and now I see the instructions have >>> >> >> changed. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ralph >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Ralph Goers < >>> >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> I figured out that the document is now at home.apache.org < >>> >> >> http://home.apache.org/>. Unfortunately, that didn’t do me any good. >>> >> gpg >>> >> >> -d is failing with “No secret key”. That doesn’t seem too surprising >>> >> since >>> >> >> my key wasn’t used to sign the document. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Ralph >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Ralph Goers < >>> >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Dominik, >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> The README file says that the keys can be found at >>> >> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc < >>> >> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc>. That url >>> >> returns >>> >> >> a 404. Any idea where it moved to? >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Ralph >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> On Aug 17, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Dominik Psenner < >>> dpsen...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> I guess that would be a nuget publish. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/publish-a-package >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> The credentials to that account are stored in the private >>> repos of >>> >> >> logging >>> >> >> >>>>> pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients >>> >> with >>> >> >> their >>> >> >> >>>>> gpg key. >>> >> >> >>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who >>> happens to >>> >> >> find >>> >> >> >>>>> them. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 08:56 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> Great! >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> How do we get the nupkg to nuget.org? This is the final step >>> >> that >>> >> >> most >>> >> >> >>>>>> users are going to be interested in. >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> Having a look at what's at the url you posted, I have ideas on >>> >> how >>> >> >> to >>> >> >> >>>>>> streamline future releases, so the next time I'm in that area, >>> >> I'm >>> >> >> >>>>>> definitely implementing those ideas. I don't see changes to >>> the >>> >> >> Release >>> >> >> >>>>>> Notes area -- if I were to try to streamline that into a >>> release, >>> >> >> would a >>> >> >> >>>>>> CHANGELOG file be useful? Or is there a better way? >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> -d >>> >> >> >>>>>> On 2020/08/16 23:26:07, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>> I committed them to dist already. I don't know how long we >>> should >>> >> >> wait >>> >> >> >>>>>> for any mirroring to catch up, though on my end, I see updated >>> >> >> >>>>>> artifacts on https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/ >>> other >>> >> >> than >>> >> >> >>>>>> the release notes. >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:09, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>> +1 to that! >>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>> Let me know when these are published. I can update the web >>> site >>> >> to >>> >> >> >>>>>> reflect that it is no longer dormant. >>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>> Ralph >>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your help in releasing this! >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Davyd McColl wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I'll make changes to the automated build to affect all >>> changes >>> >> >> you >>> >> >> >>>>>> have >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> made (and perhaps will make) automatically to future >>> releases >>> >> >> for the >>> >> >> >>>>>> next >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> release. Apologies for making this more difficult than it >>> >> needs >>> >> >> to be >>> >> >> >>>>>> (: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -d >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On August 16, 2020 20:37:01 Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Just a simple copy of the LICENSE and NOTICE file into the >>> >> >> binaries >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> zip, and a rename of the files to include "apache" in the >>> >> name. >>> >> >> I've >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> uploaded them to dist along with updating the KEYS file >>> for >>> >> >> log4net, >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> though that should probably be merged together with the >>> >> >> project-wide >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> KEYS file in the parent directory. There's an outdated >>> >> >> README.html in >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> the directory still containing the old release notes, but >>> we >>> >> can >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> address that next. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:12, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> One issue I found in one of the artifacts that I can >>> address >>> >> >> before >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> uploading since it wasn't signed is the binaries zip is >>> >> >> missing the >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE file. I'm not sure if there's a standard way to >>> >> >> include that >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> in the nupkg file, but I did see that in its metadata, it >>> >> >> explicitly >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> says the code is Apache2 licensed at least. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:03, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll sign and publish the artifacts today. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:43, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Remko. That makes 3 +1 votes from PMC members. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 2:12 PM, Remko Popma wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 Remko. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:04 AM Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me. We can handle the release signing >>> >> afterwards as >>> >> >> >>>>>> Ralph >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> suggests. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:30, Ralph Goers >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can other PMC members please review this? It has >>> been >>> >> more >>> >> >> >>>>>> than 72 >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Davyd McColl >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I've never done this before, so bear with >>> me >>> >> if I >>> >> >> >>>>>> fluff it: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposed vote to release log4net 2.0.9 >>> from >>> >> PR >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/61 >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts (including source zip) are at: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/builds/34063235/artifacts >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source can be checked out from >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> https://github.com/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/logging-log4net, >>> >> >> >>>>>> tag rel/ >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.9. I can't push tags to the upstream, but this >>> tag >>> >> is >>> >> >> >>>>>> exactly the >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same commit as the last in the PR mentioned above, >>> which >>> >> >> was >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> accepted into >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master a few days ago. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please check out the artifacts & if everyone is ok >>> >> with >>> >> >> >>>>>> what's there, >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please can someone with the rights to publish to >>> nuget >>> >> do >>> >> >> so. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I've seen how this process works, I'd like to >>> >> >> tackle the >>> >> >> >>>>>> CVE that >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been brought up on this list more than once -- >>> it's >>> >> a >>> >> >> >>>>>> simple change >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was already committed to the develop branch >>> some >>> >> time >>> >> >> >>>>>> ago, so >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> there >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are a couple of options here: >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. cherry-pick that commit & do a 2.0.10 release >>> >> pronto, >>> >> >> with >>> >> >> >>>>>> only >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that change >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. trawl the develop branch to see what else was >>> >> already >>> >> >> >>>>>> solved in >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, and get that out as 2.0.10, and perhaps close >>> out >>> >> >> that >>> >> >> >>>>>> branch to >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid future confusion. >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your time >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -d >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker >>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>>> Matt Sicker >>> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>